ARTEMIS, goddess of the hunt, wilderness, moon and chastity.

I watched the Artemis launch last night from my very grounded bar stool. I tried to analyze my emotions and came up with anger. And a touch of sadness or melancholy. 

In the summer of 1971, I stood on a beach just south of Cape Canaveral/Kennedy and watched a massive Saturn V rocket launch Apollo 15 to the moon. I was 19, at a military academy,  and so proud of our country. Only two years earlier Neil Armstrong had set foot on the moon and I saw it in the middle of the night in black and white. And my uncle had been part of the team that put that TV camera together. And between those two events, Apollo 13 suffered its catastrophe, and American ingenuity, bravery and ultimate can-do attitude brought our astronauts back safely. 

Mercury. Gemini. Apollo. The US meant business, was in space, on the moon and headed out further. Apollo 17 went back to the moon in December, 1972.

Then, America lost its way. Vietnam, War on Poverty, urban unrest, whatever it was, it was a Jimmy Carter-like malaise. I remember at the time some of the arguments – if we can put a man on the moon, we should be able to eradicate poverty. That was a big one.

After watching the launch last night, then staying up late to watch the maneuvering testing in the capsule (no toggle switches, analog instruments, nor mechanical controls! All touch screens, tablets and a thumb controller!), I asked Grok to compare figures for me. If we had continued NASA funding at Apollo-like funding (it peaked in 1966 at 4.4% of the federal budget. Today it is 0.35% of the federal budget), we would have spent somewhere between 6 and 9 trillion dollars (in 2024 dollars) on the space program. Yikes. That sounds like a lot of money. But that was supposed to have given us sustained lunar bases, early Mars missions, larger space stations, all per the original post-Apollo plans. 

Let’s compare that to the “War on Poverty”: Since the end of the Apollo program (roughly after 1973), the U.S. has spent an estimated $15–25+ trillion (in inflation-adjusted dollars) on means-tested anti-poverty and welfare programs.

Given recent stories about massive fraud in social programs, one would have to think that a significant portion of the $15-25+ trillion was wasted or stolen. 

And have we “won” the war on poverty? Hardly. Stanford University said:

our findings indicate that the growth of antipoverty policies has reduced the overall level of poverty, with substantial reductions among the elderly, disabled, and blacks. However, the poverty rates for children, especially those living in single-parent families, and families headed by a low-skill, low-education person, have increased. Rates of deep poverty (families living with less than one-half of the poverty line) for the nonelderly population have not decreased, reflecting both the increasing labor market difficulties faced by the low-skill population and the tilt of means-tested benefits away from the poorest of the poor.

https://inequality.stanford.edu/publications/media/details/war-poverty-measurement-trends-and-policy

So, you tell me – should I be angry seeing that we wasted 54 years before going back to the moon? That we are still a one-planet, all our eggs in one basket species living on a rock in space that routinely over millennia gets bombarded with life-destroying objects? That we wasted trillions of dollars on “the poor”, who will always be with us? I hope we become a true spacefaring species again. Low Earth Orbit is great, but there is more out there. 

God-speed to the Artemis crew. 

Cousins

To: Amelia amelia.banks@outlook.co.uk

Subject: Re: Re: Cousin, the invasion is accelerating on both sides of the pond – the evil forces aren’t even hiding it anymore

Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:03:11 -0400

Amelia,

I knew you’d get it. That Rotherham video is everywhere over here too. The same script: deny it, smear the victims, import more of the problem.

Here the NGOs are literally running ads in Venezuela and Haiti telling them “come now, the border is wide open and the free money is waiting.” Then they sue Texas when we try to stop the buses. It’s coordinated. Same foundations, same talking points, same endgame: break the West, demoralise the natives, install a compliant replacement population that doesn’t remember 1776 or 1066 or Magna Carta or any of the things that made us dangerous to tyrants.

They want us atomised, resentful, and too busy fighting each other to notice the real architects at the top. I’m putting together a big piece next week naming the foundations and the politicians who’ve taken their money. Might get the blog deplatformed again but fuck it – someone has to say it.

Miss you more. When this all goes tits up, you’re welcome on the farm. Bring whatever cats survive.

Stay safe, stay savage,

Emily

From: Amelia amelia.banks@outlook.co.uk

To: Emily emily@katnapfever.blog

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Cousin, the invasion is accelerating on both sides of the pond – the evil forces aren’t even hiding it anymore

Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 21:22:09 +0000

Deal. I’ll pack the surviving cats and the family shotgun.

You’re right – it’s not about compassion. It never was. It’s demographic warfare dressed up as charity. The end of the West as we knew it, delivered by people who hate what we built and can’t wait to watch it burn.

Keep writing, cousin. The normies are waking up faster than the censors can keep up. One day the bill will come due.

Love you to bits,

Amelia

P.S. If the blog gets nuked again, I’ve got a mate who runs a dark-web mirror. Just say the word. 

.22 Caliber Math

Yes, we do math here. Emily is taking you back to old-fashioned book learning. With a very practical application.

We’ve recently shown that, yes, you can accurately shoot a .22 Long Rifle bullet and hit a 5” target 300 yards away. It does take practice, but so do all good-to-have skills.
So what? Well, can that round be lethal at that range? It might be nice to know if there was a tasty rabbit or a less tasty squirrel or other source of protein out there. And you just couldn’t get any closer. Or if a farmer asked you to clean out ground hogs, woodchucks, whatever from his plowed fields. But does the .22 have the kinetic energy sufficient do to so?

Now, math. Kinetic Energy is one of several ways to measure bullet effectiveness. Let’s make some comparisons using our KE = 1/2 x Mass x Velocity Squared. For a .50 BMG (like from a Ma Deuce machine gun), plug in bullet weight of, yes, 660 grains and a muzzle velocity of 2900 feet per second. Kinetic energy comes out to an amazing 12,324 foot pounds. That’s lethal to light armored vehicles at a mile.
How about an M4/AR15 round? Plug in 62 grains and 3,025 fps and you get 1,260 foot pounds, generally accepted as lethal to humans at 500 yards.
How about a 1911 shooting a 230 grain bullet at 850 fps? 369 foot pounds. Clearly lethal at pistol engagement range.

But how about a tiny little 40 grain .22 round traveling at 1,260 fps? A paltry 141 foot pounds. And that’s at the muzzle.
“But, Mr. Red”, you say, “.22s have killed a bunch of people!” Yep. It’s called ubiquity. It’s not magic; there are just a metric sh*t ton of .22s.
The .22 is not generally accepted as a self-defense round, but shear numbers give that result. So there’s something more going on than just energy.

Tomorrow let’s talk about bullet design, wound channels, cross-sections and bullet placement. But still keep in mind our long range .22 shots.

Cousin Amelia

From: Emily emily@katnapfever.blog

To: Amelia amelia.banks@outlook.co.uk

Subject: Cousin, the invasion is accelerating on both sides of the pond – the evil forces aren’t even hiding it anymore

Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:12:47 -0400

Hey Amelia,

Hope you’re not freezing your arse off in that grey little island of yours. I just posted the latest on KatNap Fever about the border numbers here and I’m fuming. Another 300k+ “encounters” last month alone, mostly military-age men from the third world who get bussed straight into red states with debit cards and hotel rooms while our vets sleep on the street. It’s not “migration,” it’s replacement.

And I know you’re seeing the same rubbish in the UK. The boats keep coming, the hotels get filled, the grooming gangs keep grooming, and Starmer’s lot just shrug and call anyone who notices “far-right.” Same script on both sides of the Atlantic.

Who’s actually running this? The NGOs with the Soros money? The Davos crowd? The same globalist parasites who need a permanent underclass that doesn’t speak the language, doesn’t share the culture, and will vote for whoever promises more free stuff? They want Western civilisation gone – replaced by something easier to rule. Low-trust, high-chaos, no more pesky middle-class taxpayers asking questions.

Tell me I’m wrong, cousin. Or better yet, tell me you’re seeing it too. Miss your face. Send pics of the cats if you’ve still got any left after the last “enrichment” wave.

Love,

Emily

KatNap Fever Blog | “Napping through the apocalypse… barely”

From: Amelia amelia.banks@outlook.co.uk

To: Emily emily@katnapfever.blog

Subject: Re: Cousin, the invasion is accelerating on both sides of the pond – the evil forces aren’t even hiding it anymore

Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 19:45:22 +0000

Em, you beautiful mad Yankee,

You’re not wrong, you’re just early… and I’m living it. Another 1,200 crossed the Channel yesterday in rubber dinghies that cost more than my bloody car. Small boats, big men, zero women or kids in sight. They get five-star hotels, £50 daily cash, and lawyers who fight deportation like it’s the Battle of Britain. Meanwhile my nan’s been on a waiting list for a hip replacement for 18 months.

The “evil forces” have names here: the UN migration pacts, the EU leftover bureaucracy, the Home Office quislings, and yes, the same billionaire philanthropists who fund the NGOs that literally advertise the route on TikTok in Arabic and Pashto. It’s not incompetence. It’s policy. Flood the West with people who have no stake in it, crash the welfare state, crash social trust, and suddenly “democracy” means whatever the new majority wants – which won’t be free speech, women’s rights, or Christmas lights.

They’ve been open about it for decades. “Diversity is our strength” was always code for “your civilisation is over.” I saw a video the other day of an Afghan “asylum seeker” in Rotherham bragging that in twenty years “you’ll be the minority.” The comments were full of British lads saying “we’re already the minority in our own cities.”

Send me the link to your latest blog post. I’ll share it round the Telegram groups that haven’t been banned yet. Love you, you mad cat lady. Stay armed and angry.

Amelia x

(P.S. The last “migrant” wave nicked three of the neighbourhood cats. Only two came back.)

In which we respond to loyal readers

Dear Mr. Red: Do you really get mail from people about the blog?
Doubting Debbie.

Dear Debbie Downer: Of course! Don’t you get daily mail inscribed with perfect cursive penmanship, properly addressed, stamped, and sent though the stellar US mail service? You don’t? Oh, you must be a loser. Or have no friends. But don’t worry! Just keep reading here and we’ll fix all that!

Dear Mr. Red: Is Emily a real person? If not, where did she come from?
Sleepless in Seacaucus.

Dear Sleepless: It depends on your definition of “real”. Not so real that Mrs. Red would take offense. Let’s just say that Emily sprang from my head fully-formed, much like Zeus and Athena.

Dear Mr. Red: With all your vast wealth of knowledge, which do you prefer, 9 mm or .45 ACP?
Wondering William

Oh, you dear sweet child! American Apple Pie or Euro-Pellet? Go reread the blog.

Dear Mr. Red: Ginger or Maryanne?
Another dear child! Much like The Paolo, Mr. Red is not required to choose.

Dear Emily: Is Mr. Red as awesome and good looking as I think?
Covetous Cougar

Dear CC: You have no idea! Of course, beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.

Mo Ballistics

After our successful .22 zeroing and ballistics table confirmation, there is more to talk about. Remember that all that work is good specifically for one rifle with one ammo type at one particular Density Altitude. Nevertheless, that is extremely useful information. With that rifle and ammo you can shoot anywhere in the world with that Density Altitude.

But it is also useful to compare against other ammo you have tested. Looking back at my Aspirin Shoot matches last year, some ammo acts very similarly. Yesterday’s CCI Standard was 7 MOA at 100 yards. At a range of DAs, Wolf and SK were also 7, while Eley Match was always 5.5 to 6. At 200 our CCI was 28, with Wolf and SK at 26 and Eley 23.5 to to 25. Although we didn’t shoot 150 with the CCI, all the other ammo came in at 15 to 16.
Useful information to know if your ballistic app crashes or you are shooting without it.

There’s another fascinating thing about many ballistic calculators. Yesterday our real life shots were very close to what was predicted. What happens if that is not the case? You can plug in your results and the calculator can adjust its trajectory formula to match. That will also predict other distances for which you have no actual information. You now have a custom ballistics table!

Other ballistics trivia: your program is going to ask you some very important questions – distance between center of the barrel and center of the scope. This is scope height and is fed in as an offset, and can be thought of as shooting a piece of paper that is covering the end of the muzzle. Your 1.5” scope height will make the bullet hole 1.5” lower than what the crosshairs see.

You’ll also be asked about bullet shape models. G1 uses a standard bullet shape like a .45 ACP bullet. That’s great for pistols or rifles shooting pistol calibers, but is nowhere near accurate for modern spitzer type bullets. G7 is the shape you want to use. Or, if you’re lucky, the ballistics program has your bullet in its library with an exact shape.

You will also need to know the rifling of your barrel. For virtually all .22s, it is 1:16 – the bullet does one complete revolution in every 16” of barrel length.

Finally, and I can’t stress this enough – you must invest in a chronograph. The prices have come way down on these. Without knowing the exact muzzle velocity of your round, you are putting garbage into the formula – GIGO – Garbage In, Garbage Out. I have seen many shooters look at the manufacturer’s advertised MV on the side of the ammo box. I can guarantee that is not the speed of the round in your rifle. You are just wasting time and ammo if you don’t use accurate info.

So, now, get a ballistics program! Most ammo manufacturers have free ones on line that will work very well. Take the time to program it before going to the range. Now, paper and pencil go in the range bag. You should have wind device that also gives you DA, although some ballistics programs will grab local weather info over the internet for you. Take your time, document everything, and see what happens.
GOOD LUCK!

Back to work Ballistics

OK, OK! Let’s talk about how to set up and use a ballistics table. Today we are going to stretch out our .22 round. The platform will be a Ruger 10-22. Now, this is not a bog standard .22, but it started out that way: a Walmart stock 10-22 with a stainless steel barrel. It shot adequately and was a lot of fun. Until I took up precision shooting. So now it has a stainless threaded Green Mountain barrel, a new trigger group from Ruger, receiver pin and recoil pin upgrades, the back of the receiver has a drilled and tapped cleaning rod hole, the receiver is bedded and the barrel free-floated, and it sports a 4×20 Vortex scope.

/

Today we are going to use CCI Standard 40 grain lead nose ammo. This is not match ammo, but can be pretty good, and easy on the budget.
The ballistics work-up will be as follows:

Zero rifle at 50 yards. Get it really good, not just accurate.

During all of this, we are taking down copious notes on muzzle velocity, standard deviation and extreme spread, as well as all turret adjustments. We already have noted the left to right wind and its additional effects on our windage adjustments. Of course, we already have written down the Density Altitude (you were paying attention back then, right?) and kept track of temperature and pressure.

Once are happy with the zero of the rifle, we are going to lock it in on the scope. The 1.75 MOA adjustment will be made zero, by lifting the turret (disengaging it) turning it to zero, and lowering the turret. Voila! You are now zeroed! BUT, for this ammo, rifle and density altitude ONLY.

Now, we average out the four muzzle velocities and get 1059 FPS. This is what we will enter into our ballistics program. I use Advanced Ballistics (Brian Litz’s company) AB Quantum – it has CCI Standard in its library and I’ve entered the zero distance, scope height and type, etc. All I’m going to do is enter the MV, then enter 100 yards, because we are moving from the 50 to the 100 yard position.

The program gives up 7.5 MOA and left .25 MOA. That gets dialed in to the elevation and windage targets respectively. Remember to adjust/focus your parallax knob on the side of the turret. Then, 5 shots at a dueling tree paddle at the 100.

Not bad, but we want precision. We are going to drop elevation down .5 MOA and add another .25 left.

Much better. We note that real life elevation at 100 is 7.0 MOA. Now for 200. The calculator says up 28.0 and left .5 MOA. We dial it in being VERY careful of counting the clicks. We go past the 0/12 mark to the next 0/12 mark, for 24 MOA and go 4 more to 28 (different scopes have different amount of numbers per revolution). Sight on the 200 yard paddle, adjust your parallax, and 5 more shots.

See the gray vertical stringing? Even more, see the gray ovals to the right on the support? Even more left windage needed – the rounds were impacting on the upright before sliding over to the target. But elevation is perfect. So, another 1 MOA left will move the impact 2” left (you remember why, correct?) So the second page of our notes looks like this.

On to 300 yards. Yes, you can hit targets at 300 with a .22.
The table gives us up 54 MOA, left 1 MOA. Dial it, parallax, and shoot.

Hard to see, but they were hitting top fifth of the target. Several were splashing in the dirt above the target, so I dropped .5 MOA for elevation. The first shots were impacting right, so I needed to add even more left windage. And it was satisfying hearing the tiny little “tink” as lead hit steel.
A dueling tree paddle is roughly 5” square. Yes, you can hit it 300 yards with a .22. And you have accurate ballistics for this load.