Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Grant Dougharty's avatar

This essay definitely makes it clear to me how rich and complicated Paul’s struggle is in the film, but you’re right it almost feels accidental, a byproduct of Spike knowing his city well. It’s not the point he’s trying to make. I left the theater feeling like damn Spike got old. The ending is an old man’s soap box. Kids these days go about it the wrong way, they want it too easy. Being rich and famous IS worthy of aspiring to, so long as you do it through lame-ass rnb instead of offensive mumble rap.

The Kamala posters, the classist treatment from the cops, the super imbalanced relationship David has with Paul, it reads like a critique, but the film just doesn’t follow through? Maybe with a different ending I would feel different, but that scene felt like some old guy shit. Climb to the top the right way and one day you too can be a dick to your driver.

High and Low the Kurosawa film has more ambiguity to it, much more direct criticism of the bourgeoisie. Or at least it doesn’t feel like it tacitly approves of the pursuit of wealth as a noble cause. I don’t need a film to condemn the bad behavior of its characters, but it felt like Spike fully stamped “I Approve This Message” on the ending, which was disappointing.

ezra's avatar

you’re bold, and you can see. great stuff

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?