The Instylla HES Hypervascular Tumor Study

The first and only FDA-approved liquid embolic for hypervascular tumor embolization supported by a prospective, randomized clinical trial

The Instylla HES Hypervascular Tumor Study

The first and only FDA-approved liquid embolic for hypervascular tumor embolization supported by a prospective, randomized clinical trial

About the Instylla HES Hypervascular Tumor Study

The Instylla HES Hypervascular Tumor study is a prospective, randomized, multi-center, subject and evaluator blinded pivotal trial evaluating the Instylla HES against Standard of Care, Transcatheter Arterial Embolization (TAE)/ Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (cTACE) procedures. The study focuses on the treatment of hypervascular tumors, with clinical and imaging follow-ups at 30 and 90 days and clinical follow-up at 180 days.

Key Study Results

0 %

Technical Success

Compared to 77.3% success with Standard of Care (SoC) 

As determined by an independent core lab.

0 %

FREEDOM FROM MAEs

As adjudicated by the CEC, NO adverse events designated as device-related only*

*Clinical Events Committee (CEC)

Patient Eligibility Criteria**

  • Confirmed hypervascular tumor on CT and/or MRI
  • TAE/TACE medically indicated
  • ECOG PS 0–2 (PS 0-1 for metastatic disease)
  • At least one target vessel5 mm
  • Expected life expectancy 6 months post-embolization
  • Tumor lesion < 8 cm in diameter

The First and Only Liquid Embolic

  • FDA-approved for hypervascular tumor embolization
  • Proven in a randomized trial vs. Standard of Care (TAE or cTACE)
  • With no clinically significant non-target embolization (NTE) observed in a pivotal study

Procedural Details

Patient CharacteristicsHydrogel Embolic System (HES) N=102Standard of Care TAE/cTACE N=48
Age in Years Mean ± SD (N)65.6 ± 12.37 (102)65.1 ± 14.09 (48)
No Previous Chemotherapy63.7% (65/102)79.2% (38/48)
No Prior Radiation83.3% (85/102)77.1% (37/48)
No Other Targeted Therapies74.5% (76/102)68.8% (33/48)
Liver (Primary HCC): 45%
Renal: 25%
Liver (Mets): 18%
Liver (Benign): 7%
Bone: 6%
MetricHES N=102SOC N=48
Mean (± SD) Number of Lesions Treated1.2 ± 0.521.2 ± 0.49
Mean (± SD) Vessel Size Treated (mm)2.0 ± 0.802.1 ± 0.84
Median Embolization Time (min)5.05.0
Mean (± SD) Cumulative Fluoroscopy Time (min)25.2 ± 17.7223.3 ± 15.42
Mean (± SD) Volume Delivered Per Vessel (mL)5.5 ± 7.07.4 ± 8.25

Additional Observations

  • Disease Control Rate†† across non-hepatic, non-HCC hepatic, and primary liver lesions was >90% at 90 days.
  • The HES arm exhibited a numerically lower incidence of additional embolization procedures beyond the 90-day follow-up (8.8% vs. 14.6% in Standard of Care)
  • Embolization with HES as a single agent was performed in > 96 % of cases; SOC treatment arm incorporated multiple embolic agents in 39.6% of cases

Conclusions

PRIMARY SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS ENDPOINTS MET
NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT NTE ASSOCIATED WITH HES IN 148 TREATED VESSELS
HES HAD 40% LESS ADDITIONAL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURES BEYOND 90-DAY FOLLOW-UP THAN DID SOC

SINGLE AGENT EMBOLIZATION
>96% IN HES ARM VS. >60% IN SOC ARM

**For a full list of eligibility criteria visit https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04523350

††Disease Control Rate includes Partial Responses, Complete Response, and Stable Disease.