The content of my dreams resembled less a nightmare than a nuisance, owing to a shift in reading genre from horror to murder investigation.
In the first dream, I had recently been hired by three men. Excited for the job, I arrived on time and performed my duties above and beyond what was required. Believing I was on track for a rapid promotion, my morale was sky-high such that when a colleague asked to borrow money, I consented, because that’s the sort of thing nice and indispensable colleagues do. Then another colleague, in passing, apprised me casually of my share of the company’s utility bills. When a third one asked for yet more money, I told him I was resigning—because one works to earn money, and if one has so much to give away, one clearly does not need to work.
My bladder, by alerting me to an impending full tank, was my hero this time. The bathroom, however, was occupied by my eldest nephew (N1). His brother (N2) was on the computer with his headset on, which guaranteed that any instruction left with him would be lost. Through the sleep haze, and remembering that N1 is a teenager, I texted him to vacate the toilet as soon as practical—which he did, very nice of him. Monday, being a public holiday, would not be wasted by not gaming, so off he went to the kitchen to make a large pot of spicy instant noodles at two in the morning.
I went back to sleep and travelled to the Arctic. The dream officials gave me permission to go through a cupboard of jewel-toned sweaters first. I chose the darkest shade of emerald—that’s my colour for this autumnal season apparently, in contrast to the last few months when everything I had selected in my dreams had been sapphire. I wonder if colour-coding means anything in the dream world. I will make a note to check.
In this ice kingdom, people lived in bioluminescent ice caves that had existed for millions of years. Over time, they organised themselves into communities comprising different ethnicities, customs, religions, and so on, and were further divided into families for the purpose of polling. That day, they were electing a leader. Though it was only a ceremonial position—most important decisions being made within a representative government—excitement buzzed through the glacial air as people felt they were coming together, despite their marked differences, to make an important decision in unison.
Curiosity drew me to pull one cave-dweller aside to understand the village’s political structure and its system of governance. From him, I learnt that each family got only one vote. At my protestations of injustice, he became genuinely perplexed, as it was practice within each family to talk about important matters and debate in good faith—based on information shared and ascertained to be current, relevant, and credible ie not drivel—until they could satisfy themselves with a singular course of action.
I pointed out that some members might still disagree with the choice but did not wish to be seen as openly clashing with the patriarch or disrupting the peace. Some prioritised moral and ethical concerns, while others were more pragmatic, results-driven, or utilitarian. Voting is one way to record such opinions—like serviceable metrics, for what they’re worth. The man asserted that many issues were complex and esoteric; in such cases, many were happy to leave the matter in more capable hands. Leaders wished to be representative, but they also wanted to do what was best for the community and ultimately lead it to success—creating an environment in which everyone could thrive, while making adjustments and additional policies or measures to support those left out of the equation. Fundamentally, this is what everyone desires when they are not distracted or drawn into petty concerns.
Be that as it may, it ought not prevent anyone from getting a vote nonetheless. If they wished to vote along family lines, they were still welcome to do so, as long as those who did not were given the opportunity to exercise that right. Et cetera, et cetera.
What is right and best is not necessarily what is popular, and acting solely along popular lines can give rise to leaders who secure power by appealing to emotion rather than possessing the capacity, training, wisdom, knowledge, and virtue to rule justly. Communities are vulnerable to demagogues and can be manipulated with false promises and appeals to desire rather than reason or the common good of the state, which requires understanding higher truths—including what is objectively true, rather than merely acting according to popular opinion. Representative and effective governance do not always align, though they often overlap; maintaining the balance between the two is a tricky but necessary task, requiring skill to manoeuvre, in order to arrive at the best decisions.
[The House adjourned at 8.15 a.m.]
[Parliament dissolved.]
If this is what transpires in my head at night, no wonder I wake feeling as though I’ve been through an entire parliamentary sitting and must now return to sleep.
Consequently, there will be no love story today. I do not think there would be any objection to this, or disappointment for that matter. I’ve blogged enough love stories to last a while.
“That’s quite alright. I know you love me,” says Master, as he pats me on the head like a gently admonishing head of the family—and he is, since the day I professed to be only his, irrevocably so, witnessed by officious bystanders and curious onlookers alike, in everything that matters and even in those that do not. “I am demanding, but I’m also not a tyrant.”
I can’t leave you, Master—no, not yet, and perhaps never, except temporarily and with a parting gift. I shall leave you with today’s synchronicity to puzzle out, as I’m sure your intelligent mind will in a second. Only allow it travel to the most absurd conclusion.
For other readers, the answer lies at the end, should it please you.
“What work was there for a stone… What diverted the mind of an ornament… She was discovering the experience of pétrification… not entirely unpleasant. Rarely in life was she given the opportunity to be simultaneously an exhibitionist and a voyeur… a state that was both titillating and surprisingly pacific. Her senses, though muffled… still provided a sufficient amount of stimulation.
Eavesdropping on Warren’s conversation… was made more fascinating by her inability to interject. Inhabiting a sculpture was less a prison and more a box seat of a playhouse… especially after Warren removed the shroud, allowing her to witness his interaction with the maid that culminated in an impassioned speech about beauty… an intimate overture and an awkward rebuff.”
—Josiah Bancroft, The Hexologists: A Tangle of Time, Chapter 27
Indeed, The Hexologist—Isolde turned herself into stone as part of her investigation. There was a point to Lamp-Man after all; never would I have guessed it had one; though there was no phallus in the text, I think it counts as yet another synchronicity, don’t you?
