It’s not just intelligent design theorists who are calling for a major rethink of biology and origin-of-life research. On this ID The Future<\/strong>, Casey Luskin speaks to host Andrew McDiarmid about two recent articles in the prestigious journal Nature<\/em> that review major problems with current theories on the origin of life and the source of genetic complexity in living things.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In a recent Nature<\/em> comment<\/a>, biochemist Nick Lane and bioengineer Joana Xavier give a sobering assessment of the origin-of-life research field, advising fellow researchers that “brash claims for a breakthrough on the origin of life are unhelpful noise if they do not come in the context of a wider framework.” Lane and Xavier identify key issues in this fractured research field, including “the relentless pressure to publish, to secure funding, tenure or promotion.” They also summarize the major problems facing two of the most popular theories for the origin of the first life: the prebiotic soup model and the hydrothermal systems hypothesis. Dr. Luskin breaks down each of their points in detail. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Luskin also discusses another recent article in Nature<\/em> from Oxford emeritus biologist Denis Noble calling for a major rethink of biology in a piece<\/a> titled \u201cIt\u2019s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for life.\u201d Noble argues that the view of biology often presented to the public is oversimplified and out of date. He says that life is “far more interesting and wonderful” than previously thought, and in a surprising twist, even acknowledges that it\u2019s the organism that controls the genome!<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Luskin explains, these frank acknowledgements from evolutionary scientists are encouraging signs and serve to confirm what ID theorists have long argued: the need for a fundamentally new way of looking at the natural world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Read the coverage at EvolutionNews.org that inspired this interview: <\/p>\n\n\n\nDig Deeper<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n