{"id":34214,"date":"2018-12-17T21:12:19","date_gmt":"2018-12-17T21:12:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/idthefuture.net\/?p=34213"},"modified":"2024-10-15T14:02:56","modified_gmt":"2024-10-15T21:02:56","slug":"1179","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/idthefuture.com\/1179\/","title":{"rendered":"Nancy Pearcey Answers the Charge: \u201cYou Guys Lost\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

On this episode of ID the Future, <\/strong>author<\/a> and Center for Science and Culture fellow Nancy Pearcey responds to the claim that the design-oriented view of biology \u201clost\u201d to an overwhelming scientific revolution, Darwinism, and subsequent discoveries have only put more nails in the design argument\u2019s coffin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There was a revolution, Pearcey acknowledges, but at its core it was philosophical and ideological, one with no room for intelligent design in biology. \u201cWithout Hegel there would have been no Darwin,\u201d Pearcey explains.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"On this episode of ID the Future, author and Center for Science and Culture fellow Nancy Pearcey responds to the claim that the design-oriented view of biology \u201clost\u201d to an overwhelming scientific revolution, Darwinism, and subsequent discoveries have only put more nails in the design argument\u2019s coffin.","protected":false},"author":48,"featured_media":39013,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_editorskit_title_hidden":false,"_editorskit_reading_time":1,"_editorskit_is_block_options_detached":false,"_editorskit_block_options_position":"{}","sync_status":"synced","episode_type":"audio","audio_file":"https:\/\/episodes.castos.com\/id\/IDTF-1179-Nancy-Pearcey-Answers-the-Charge-You-Guys-Lost.mp3","podmotor_file_id":"213023","podmotor_episode_id":"191149","castos_file_data":"","cover_image":"","cover_image_id":"","duration":"00:15:13","filesize":"10.6 mb","filesize_raw":"11123451","date_recorded":"2018-12-17","explicit":"","block":"","itunes_episode_number":"1179","itunes_title":"","itunes_season_number":"","itunes_episode_type":"full","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[2365,269,453,1693,562,680,1694,827,987,1061,1083],"series":[7227],"speaker":[],"class_list":["post-34214","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-__edited","tag-charles-darwin","tag-design-argument","tag-duane-gish","tag-evolution","tag-genetics","tag-hegel","tag-isaac-newton","tag-mendel","tag-nancy-pearcey","tag-neo-darwinism","series-intelligent-design-the-future"],"acf":[],"author_names":["Nancy Pearcey"],"episode_featured_image":"https:\/\/idthefuture.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2020\/10\/devastated-after-losing-scaled.jpg","episode_player_image":"https:\/\/idthefuture.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2021\/08\/idthefuture-cover.jpg","download_link":"https:\/\/op3.dev\/e\/idthefuture.com\/podcast-download\/34214\/1179.mp3","player_link":"https:\/\/op3.dev\/e\/idthefuture.com\/podcast-player\/34214\/1179.mp3","audio_player":"https:\/\/op3.dev\/e\/idthefuture.com\/podcast-player\/34214\/1179.mp3<\/a><\/audio>","episode_data":{"playerMode":"dark","subscribeUrls":[],"rssFeedUrl":"https:\/\/idthefuture.com\/feed\/podcast\/intelligent-design-the-future","embedCode":"

Nancy Pearcey Answers the Charge: \u201cYou Guys Lost\u201d<\/a><\/blockquote>