Please consider donating to help with the cost of hosting this website. Please help me raise £300 to pay for hosting costs.
.
The following studies were completed in 2022 and utilise VAERS data from 2021 only.
Severity of Lots for Different Countries
This website attracted input from researchers around the world, and one of them contributed an insight that enables us to filter VAERS for each foreign country separately. The usefulness of this was that it enables us to see which batches/lots are causing the most harm in each country - and also if particular countries were being more exposed to harm compared to others. In the non-domestic table of VAERS there was a column called SPLTTYPE (this column was later removed by CDC to hide specific country data). The first two letters of each entry in this column denoted the country in accordance with the two letter country-codes shown here - 2-letter country codes.
Here are the results for each country. In each case I have only included lots generating at least 50 adverse reports. The TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTS column is the total number of reports found in VAERS for that country, and consequently is a representative sample for that country - illustrating the proportions of disability, death etc.
The high rates in some countries may have been due to deployment of adulterated vaccines - resulting in higher toxicity. Much of the discrepancy was generated by excessive disability following vaccination.
Here is a visual way of seeing which countries were having the severest problems with the vaccines - the larger the circle, the greater the number of deaths and disabilities per 1000 adverse reaction reports.
Great Britain
Note that the % of severe reports is quite high for some lots, rising to 23%. This is higher than we found for any lots in the USA.
France
Germany
Japan
Italy
Austria
Having introduced the most punitive coercive policies, Austria also had batches with lowest toxicity. Note how their vaccine profile differs markedly from other European countries.
Netherlands
Spain
Belgium
Belgium had extremely high % of reports that were severe. Curiously, these very high percentages resulted from very high disability rates following vaccination, rather than a high death rate. The death rates were similar to other countries, but the disability rate was sky high. This was a major safety signal.
Alarming Discovery About Belgium Results
Reminder : This analysis only used 2021 data, when individual country codes were available in VAERS. They have since been removed / suppressed.
When I looked at the immediacy of adverse reactions for all ages, the onset of adverse reactions was within 48 hours for 56% of the reports. This was high. However, one of my colleagues wanted data just on young people of an athletic age (18-35), so I filtered for that age range. On doing so I obtained 887 reports that provided an onset interval. Of these 887 reports, 700 reports had onset within 24 hours - thats 79% of the reports. 806 had onset within 48 hours - thats 90% ! This was a staggeringly high %. It is generally held that a more potent toxin brings about a faster intoxication.
I decided to filter for just disability in this age range (18-35). I found 881 reports of disability, but only 738 had a record of the number of days till onset. Of these 738 records of disability following vaccination, the onset of disability was within 24 hours for 604 reports (81%) and was within 48 hours for 702 reports (95%). We can therefore say that the onset of disability was very quick for this large number of young people of athletic age. 95% within 48 hours.
Here is a video describing these findings - video
Here is a pdf that you can download and share - The Curious Case of Belgium
Sweden
Sweden, too, had a very high % of reports that were severe - once again, due to a very high number of disabilities induced by the vaccine. Curiously, the death rate following vaccination remained low in comparison.
199 reports were of people aged 18-35 who became disabled after taking the vaccine. 126 (63%) of these young people became disabled within 24 hours. 144 (72%) became disabled within 48 hours. These are big percentages. If the vaccines had this immediate effect on young people of athletic age, then they must have been very toxic.
In addition to this, a further 45 young people suffered a life threatening event, and 1 died. 26 (56%) of these life threatening events happened within 24 hours, and 32 (70%) of these events happened within 48 hours of taking the vaccine.
Finland was similar. They had 116 cases of disability following vaccination where the day of onset of disability was known. In 91 of these reports (78%) the disability started within 24 hours of the vaccination. In 99 of these reports (85%) the disability started within 48 hours after the vaccination.
Portugal
Australia
In 2021 VAERS received 5061 adverse reports for Australia. However only 18 of these reports had lot numbers. This is appalling. The Australian Government was hiding and covering up vital information from their own populations. It is possible to tell the degree to which a government cares for its population by the care with which they keep medical records pertaining to adverse reactions. There were reports of 302 people dying, but only 1 of these reports had a lot number. This is incredible negligence on behalf of the government and the medical profession.
Canada
VAERS records 88 deaths, 357 disabilities and 150 life threatening events following vaccination - consequently, the % of severe reports is 14% - approximately the same as the UK.
Of the 4240 adverse reports, only 1544 have recorded their lot number.
Of the 88 who are reported with fatal outcomes, only 10 have lot numbers - which demonstrates a perculiar negligence on the part of Canadian doctors - similar to that found in Australia.
Of the 150 who reported disability, 148 have lot numbers - so it is interesting to see which lot numbers were responsible.
I also looked at the age distribution of severe adverse reactions.
- 25% of reports were in the age range 12 to 34 years
- 25% of deaths were in the age range 17 to 29 years
- 25% of disabilities were in the age range 11 to 37 years
- 25% of life threatening events were in the age range 13 to 39 years
