Skip to content

Pass POSIX_C_SOURCE for std::alligned_alloc try_compile checks#1896

Merged
Dead2 merged 1 commit intozlib-ng:developfrom
cvijdea-bd:freebsd-aligned-alloc
Apr 7, 2025
Merged

Pass POSIX_C_SOURCE for std::alligned_alloc try_compile checks#1896
Dead2 merged 1 commit intozlib-ng:developfrom
cvijdea-bd:freebsd-aligned-alloc

Conversation

@cvijdea-bd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cvijdea-bd cvijdea-bd commented Apr 4, 2025

On FreeBSD 11, defining POSIX_C_SOURCE to a lower level has the efect of inhibiting the language level (__ISO_C_VISIBLE) to be lower than C11, even in the presence of -std=c11

Since the check_symbol_exists runs without setting POSIX_C_SOURCE, this means that we will spuriously define HAVE_ALIGNED_ALLOC, while in the actual build it is not going to be defined

ref: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/stable/11/sys/sys/cdefs.h#L738

Summary by CodeRabbit

Our system's build process has been updated to improve compatibility and stability regarding memory allocation handling.

  • Chores
    • Enhanced the build configuration to support both POSIX and C11 standards for aligned memory allocation, contributing to improved compliance and system reliability. This update ensures a more stable build process and better overall performance.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the build configuration in CMakeLists.txt and the configure script by modifying the CMAKE_REQUIRED_DEFINITIONS and adding preprocessor directives. The changes merge the previously separate definitions for POSIX and C11 standards into single commands, ensuring that both _POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L and _ISOC11_SOURCE=1 are defined during the aligned memory allocation configuration tests. Additionally, the configure script includes new directives to enable specific features for aligned memory allocation. No changes were made to any public entity declarations.

Changes

File Change Summary
CMakeLists.txt Updated the CMAKE_REQUIRED_DEFINITIONS to combine the definitions for POSIX and C11 support into single commands for aligned memory allocation checks.
configure Added preprocessor directives to enable features related to aligned memory allocation in the test C code snippets.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Build Env

Suggested reviewers

  • Dead2

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca4e85a and 0a2c0cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CMakeLists.txt (2 hunks)
  • configure (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • configure
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • CMakeLists.txt

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Dead2 Dead2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.42%. Comparing base (724dc0c) to head (0a2c0cc).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1896      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    82.85%   83.42%   +0.56%     
===========================================
  Files          144      144              
  Lines        12946    12950       +4     
  Branches      2855     2858       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits         10727    10804      +77     
+ Misses        1248     1198      -50     
+ Partials       971      948      -23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Dead2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Dead2 commented Apr 6, 2025

Actually, this should be changed in Configure as well, so they are kept in sync.

@cvijdea-bd Would you mind adding the defines to Configure as well?

#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200112L

#define _ISOC11_SOURCE 1

On FreeBSD 11, definining POSIX_C_SOURCE to a lower level has the efect of inhibiting the language level (__ISO_C_VISIBLE ) to be lower than C11, even in the presence of -std=c11

Since the check_symbol_exists runs without setting POSIX_C_SOURCE, this means that we will spuriously define HAVE_ALIGNED_ALLOC, while in the actual build it is not going to be defined

ref: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/stable/11/sys/sys/cdefs.h#L738
@cvijdea-bd cvijdea-bd force-pushed the freebsd-aligned-alloc branch from ca4e85a to 0a2c0cc Compare April 7, 2025 00:18
@cvijdea-bd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yes that makes sense, I pushed the modified commit

@Dead2 Dead2 merged commit b2a0ffb into zlib-ng:develop Apr 7, 2025
146 of 152 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants