Skip to content

test: add bitcoin e2e test deposit_call#2895

Merged
ws4charlie merged 7 commits intodevelopfrom
e2e-bitcoin-deposit-and-call
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

test: add bitcoin e2e test deposit_call#2895
ws4charlie merged 7 commits intodevelopfrom
e2e-bitcoin-deposit-and-call

Conversation

@ws4charlie
Copy link
Contributor

@ws4charlie ws4charlie commented Sep 18, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Description

Add bitcoin_deposit_and_call e2e test.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Tested CCTX in localnet
  • Tested in development environment
  • Go unit tests
  • Go integration tests
  • Tested via GitHub Actions

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an end-to-end test for Bitcoin deposits and calls, enhancing the testing framework for Bitcoin functionalities.
    • Added a new test case to validate Bitcoin deposits and smart contract interactions on the ZetaChain platform.

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved robustness in transaction amount conversion for Bitcoin deposits, ensuring accurate calculations and error handling.

  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog to reflect the new Bitcoin deposit and call test case.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces an end-to-end (e2e) testing framework for Bitcoin deposits and calls within the ZetaChain platform. It adds new test cases to ensure the accuracy and reliability of Bitcoin-related functionalities, including the deposit process and contract interactions. The changes encompass the addition of a dedicated test function, modifications to existing transaction handling, and updates to the changelog to reflect these enhancements.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
changelog.md Updated to document the addition of an e2e test for Bitcoin deposits and calls.
cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go Added e2etests.TestBitcoinDepositAndCallName to the bitcoinTests slice in localE2ETest.
e2e/e2etests/e2etests.go Introduced TestBitcoinDepositAndCallName constant and a new runner.E2ETest instance for Bitcoin deposit testing.
e2e/e2etests/test_bitcoin_deposit_call.go Created a new test function TestBitcoinDepositAndCall to validate Bitcoin deposit and contract invocation.
e2e/runner/bitcoin.go Modified SendToTSSFromDeployerWithMemo to improve the transaction amount conversion process.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

no-changelog, ADMIN_TESTS

Suggested reviewers

  • lumtis
  • fbac
  • swift1337
  • brewmaster012
  • skosito
  • kingpinXD

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

ws4charlie
ws4charlie commented Sep 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
@ws4charlie ws4charlie added E2E E2E tests related chain:bitcoin Bitcoin chain related labels Sep 18, 2024
@ws4charlie ws4charlie marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 04:50
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d17118 and cc92e49.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • changelog.md (1 hunks)
  • cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/e2etests/e2etests.go (2 hunks)
  • e2e/e2etests/test_bitcoin_deposit_call.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/runner/bitcoin.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (4)
e2e/e2etests/test_bitcoin_deposit_call.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

e2e/runner/bitcoin.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

e2e/e2etests/e2etests.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

Additional comments not posted (5)
e2e/runner/bitcoin.go (1)

201-205: LGTM!

The changes address the precision issue mentioned in the past review comment by using zetabitcoin.GetSatoshis for the amount conversion. The static fee is also explicitly noted, improving code readability. The error handling for the conversion is done correctly.

cmd/zetae2e/local/local.go (1)

293-293: LGTM!

The addition of the e2etests.TestBitcoinDepositAndCallName test case to the bitcoinTests slice is consistent with the PR objective and follows the existing naming convention.

e2e/e2etests/e2etests.go (2)

76-76: LGTM!

The constant name is clear, follows the naming convention, and accurately describes the test scenario.

455-462: LGTM!

The runner.NewE2ETest instance for the TestBitcoinDepositAndCallName test scenario is well-defined:

  • The test name matches the constant.
  • The description accurately summarizes the test scenario.
  • The argument definition for the Bitcoin deposit amount is appropriate, with a reasonable default value.
  • The TestBitcoinDepositAndCall function is referenced correctly as the test implementation.
changelog.md (1)

30-30: Changelog entry looks good.

The changelog entry clearly documents the addition of the e2e test for Bitcoin deposit and call, with the PR number and link provided. It is appropriately categorized under the "Tests" section.

@ws4charlie ws4charlie added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 17f26e6 Sep 18, 2024
@ws4charlie ws4charlie deleted the e2e-bitcoin-deposit-and-call branch September 18, 2024 11:13
This was referenced Sep 19, 2024
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Sep 23, 2024
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Oct 3, 2024
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Oct 22, 2024
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Nov 1, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Nov 12, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Nov 20, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Feb 19, 2025
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Mar 3, 2025
Merged
Closed
This was referenced Mar 19, 2025
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@skosito skosito skosito approved these changes

@brewmaster012 brewmaster012 Awaiting requested review from brewmaster012

@kingpinXD kingpinXD Awaiting requested review from kingpinXD

@fbac fbac Awaiting requested review from fbac

+2 more reviewers

@lumtis lumtis lumtis approved these changes

@swift1337 swift1337 swift1337 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

breaking:cli chain:bitcoin Bitcoin chain related E2E E2E tests related

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ws4charlie @lumtis @swift1337 @skosito