Description

Consider refactoring integer fields with simple constraints (like >0) to use pydantic's conint instead of manual validators for cleaner, more declarative validation.

Context

During review of PR #1234, it was suggested to use conint(gt=0) instead of manual validators for the rate_limit_max field in the WebUi class. This pattern could be applied to other similar fields throughout the codebase.

Examples of fields that could benefit

• rate_limit_max in WebUi class (components/clp-py-utils/clp_py_utils/clp_config.py)
• retention_period fields with >0 constraints
• Other integer fields with simple positive value constraints

Benefits

• More declarative validation
• Cleaner code by removing manual validators
• Consistent validation approach across the codebase

References

• Original PR: fix(webui): Expose rate limit configuration (fixes #1019); Increase rate limit to 1000 req/min (fixes #1020). #1234
• Discussion: fix(webui): Expose rate limit configuration (fixes #1019); Increase rate limit to 1000 req/min (fixes #1020). #1234 (comment)
• Requested by: @junhaoliao