Skip to content

fix install script incompatibility with coreutils 9.10#7386

Merged
waruqi merged 1 commit intoxmake-io:devfrom
k6v5:fix-buildscript
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

fix install script incompatibility with coreutils 9.10#7386
waruqi merged 1 commit intoxmake-io:devfrom
k6v5:fix-buildscript

Conversation

@k6v5
Copy link
Contributor

@k6v5 k6v5 commented Mar 9, 2026

The newest version of GNU Coreutils (9.10) changed the cli parser. In the shell install script, the space in tail -c 7 results in an error: tail: cannot open '7' for reading. Changing to tail -c7 makes the error go away on 9.10 and works in older versions as well.

@k6v5 k6v5 changed the title fix buildscript incompatibility with coreutils 9.10 fix install script incompatibility with coreutils 9.10 Mar 9, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical compatibility issue within the build script, ensuring its continued functionality after a recent update to GNU Coreutils. By adjusting a command-line argument, the change prevents build failures and maintains robust operation across different system environments.

Highlights

  • Coreutils Compatibility: The build script scripts/get.sh was updated to resolve an incompatibility with GNU Coreutils version 9.10. The tail -c 7 command was changed to tail -c7 to prevent an error where tail would misinterpret the argument due to a change in its CLI parser. This ensures the script functions correctly on both older and newer coreutils versions.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • scripts/get.sh
    • Modified the tail command's character count argument to remove a space, resolving an incompatibility with coreutils 9.10.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request fixes an incompatibility with coreutils 9.10 by changing tail -c 7 to tail -c7. While this is a valid fix for the immediate issue, the method of extracting the version number is fragile and will break when tag names change length (e.g., from v1.2.3 to v1.10.0). I've suggested a more robust way to extract the latest version tag that doesn't rely on a fixed character count.

cp -r . $projectdir
elif test_eq "$branch" "__run__"; then
version=$(git ls-remote --tags "$gitrepo" | tail -c 7)
version=$(git ls-remote --tags "$gitrepo" | tail -c7)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While your change fixes the immediate issue with coreutils 9.10, the method of extracting the version number is fragile. It relies on the tag name being a fixed length. For example, if the version changes from v2.9.9 to v2.10.0, the tag length will change, and tail -c7 will extract an incorrect version string.

A more robust approach would be to sort the tags as versions and extract the last part of the ref:

version=$(git ls-remote --tags --sort='v:refname' "$gitrepo" | tail -n 1 | sed 's|.*/||')

This ensures you always get the latest version tag regardless of its length.

Suggested change
version=$(git ls-remote --tags "$gitrepo" | tail -c7)
version=$(git ls-remote --tags --sort='v:refname' "$gitrepo" | tail -n 1 | sed 's|.*/||')

@waruqi waruqi added this to the v3.0.8 milestone Mar 9, 2026
@waruqi waruqi merged commit 19f9986 into xmake-io:dev Mar 9, 2026
37 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants