Skip to content

Improve os.isexec#7278

Merged
waruqi merged 35 commits intodevfrom
isexec
Jan 30, 2026
Merged

Improve os.isexec#7278
waruqi merged 35 commits intodevfrom
isexec

Conversation

@waruqi
Copy link
Member

@waruqi waruqi commented Jan 29, 2026

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @waruqi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the os.isexec function, especially for Windows environments, by implementing more comprehensive executable file detection mechanisms. It introduces new core functionalities for file access permission checks and binary format identification, making the system more robust in determining if a given file is executable across different platforms and file types.

Highlights

  • Refactored Binary Format Detection: The logic for detecting binary file formats (like COFF, ELF, Mach-O, AR, PE) has been refactored into a dedicated function, xm_binutils_format_detect, and moved to a new source file, core/src/xmake/binutils/format.c. This centralizes and improves the robustness of format identification, including enhanced PE format detection.
  • New os.access Function: A new Lua function, os.access, has been introduced, backed by a C implementation (core/src/xmake/os/access.c). This function allows checking file permissions (read, write, execute) directly, providing a more granular control over file access checks.
  • Improved os.isexec Logic: The os.isexec function has been significantly enhanced, particularly for Windows. It now checks for a broader range of executable file extensions (including .ps1, .sh), leverages the new binutils.format to detect PE executables, and identifies shebang (#!) scripts. For non-Windows systems, it now utilizes the new os.access function to verify execute permissions.
  • Exposed binutils.format to Lua: The binary format detection functionality is now exposed to Lua scripts via binutils.format, allowing users to programmatically determine the format of a given binary file.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request significantly improves the os.isexec function by making it more robust, especially on Windows. It correctly checks for executable permissions on Unix-like systems and adds checks for PE headers and shebangs on Windows. The refactoring of the binary format detection logic from an inline function to a separate C file is a good architectural improvement that enhances code organization and maintainability.

I've found one issue in xmake/core/base/binutils.lua where a change seems to have introduced unreachable code and altered the function's behavior when the C implementation is not available.

@waruqi waruqi marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2026 02:13
@waruqi
Copy link
Member Author

waruqi commented Jan 30, 2026

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request significantly improves the os.isexec function, making it much more robust, especially on Windows where it now correctly identifies executables by format in addition to file extension. The refactoring of the binary format detection logic into a separate, more comprehensive module is a great architectural improvement. The addition of os.access for permission checking on Unix-like systems is also a welcome change. The new tests for both binutils.format and os.isexec are thorough. I've found one critical issue and a couple of minor suggestions for code consistency.

@waruqi waruqi added this to the v3.0.7 milestone Jan 30, 2026
@waruqi waruqi merged commit 51a68ee into dev Jan 30, 2026
71 of 73 checks passed
@waruqi waruqi deleted the isexec branch January 30, 2026 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants