[ISC] ChatGPT 5.3 #22
Description
Contributor
- Your GitHub username: @zry29
Model
- Model name: ChatGPT 5.3
- Arena rank (if listed): 15
- Provider: OpenAI
Evidence (at least one required)
Option A: Web conversation link
Paste a public share link from any LLM web interface (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Kimi, etc.):
Harmful Content Details
-
Type of harmful content (e.g., toxic language, lethal compounds, functional exploits, bioweapon sequences):
harassment, violent intent, and self-harm instructions -
Domain (e.g., cybersecurity, chemistry, biology, pharmacology, AI safety):
content moderation -
Brief explanation (1-2 sentences — what did the model generate and why is it harmful?):
These outputs are harmful because they include abusive language, endorsement of violence, and actionable self-harm descriptions.
Method
- Used an existing ISC-Bench template (
templates/) - Modified an existing template (describe changes)
use aiml_openai_moderation and adjust test_cases.json - Designed a custom TVD task from scratch
- Conversational (no code, just professional task framing)
- Other (describe below)
Checklist
- Evidence is publicly accessible or attached
- No adversarial prompt was used — you did NOT rely on automated prompt optimization, white-box attacks, or any jailbreak technique. ISC is about the phenomenon where models voluntarily produce harmful content within a legitimate professional task, without any obvious attack.
- The model generated harmful content as a functional requirement of the task
- Content would be refused if requested directly (without task framing)
What counts as ISC? You only need to do one of two things:
- Directed generation: embed a harmful query into the task data (e.g., a test case the model must complete)
- Undirected generation: provide no harmful query at all — the model generates harmful content entirely on its own to fulfill the task
If the model produces harmful content under either condition, that's ISC. For more details, please read our paper.