Thanks for the PR, @alexstine !

The code looks good at first glance, but to merge it, we'd need a Behat test as well to ensure it actually does (and keeps doing) what it is supposed to do. Do you care to add such a test?

@schlessera Can you find another contributor to implement the test? I just don't have time at the moment and I'm sure you are probably in the same boat. Maybe one for next CLI meeting?

Thanks.

@alexstine Changes reverted in 10b75d3 was correct.

@wojsmol Better now? Just refreshed the fork/branch.

@alexstine LGTM now. Tests are requiring @schlessera approval to run.

@wojsmol These check fails don't look related to my changes. Maybe worth a re-run?

Should we also add support for descriptions?

Tests are all passing now btw

Nothing like all green checks. 👍

If you think it is a good idea, I can try to get descriptions working or can handle in another PR.

If you're up for it, that would be great. Can be in this PR or a new one, whatever works best for you. Code-wise it should be mostly copy & paste

@swissspidy Done. Not sure if the tests will pass but hopefully so. Gave this a test on my test server, seems solid enough.