Skip to content

Remove need for breaking change MappingsSaver.mutate#3383

Merged
Mahoney merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
no-mutate
Apr 10, 2026
Merged

Remove need for breaking change MappingsSaver.mutate#3383
Mahoney merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
no-mutate

Conversation

@Mahoney

@Mahoney Mahoney commented Apr 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

It wasn't necessary.

Submitter checklist

  • Recommended: Join WireMock Slack to get any help in #help-contributing or a project-specific channel like #wiremock-java
  • The PR request is well described and justified, including the body and the references
  • The PR title represents the desired changelog entry
  • The repository's code style is followed (see the contributing guide)
  • Test coverage that demonstrates that the change works as expected
  • For new features, there's necessary documentation in this pull request or in a subsequent PR to wiremock.org

@Mahoney Mahoney requested a review from a team as a code owner April 10, 2026 14:57

@leeturner leeturner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Like this much better. One minor question but not a blocker by any means. Nice work

Not sure why StubMappings has this convention of returning the stub(s)
that were passed in, when the return value is not used, but it does, so
following suit.
@Mahoney Mahoney mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2026
6 tasks
@Mahoney Mahoney merged commit d49e94c into master Apr 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@Mahoney Mahoney deleted the no-mutate branch April 10, 2026 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants