Skip to content

wenh06/cinc2025

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

251 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

CinC2025

docker-ci-and-test format-check

Detection of Chagas Disease from the ECG: The George B. Moody PhysioNet Challenge 2025

Challenge Website

💀💀💀 BIG MISTAKE: Forgot to add (z-score) normalization in the preprocessing pipeline in the config!!! 💀💀💀

The Conference

Conference Website | Unofficial Phase Leaderboard1 | Official Phase Leaderboard | Final Test Results

     

The Conference Poster

Click to view the details
The Conference Poster
The Conference Poster

👉 Back to TOC

Description of the files/folders(modules)

Files

Click to view the details

Folders(Modules)

Click to view the details

👉 Back to TOC

Key problem to solve

The data is highly imbalanced, with only approximately 2% of the data being positive. Dealing with the imbalanced data is the key problem to solve in this challenge. Possible solutions include:

  • Upsampling the positive data
  • Downsampling the negative data
  • Using Focal Loss, Asymmetric Loss, etc.
  • Using class weights
  • Using data augmentation, including Mixup, Cutmix, etc.

Background knowledge

Chagas Disease and ECG

According to a review paper about ECG abnormalities in Chagas Disease, the most common ECG abnormalities are:

  • Prevalence of overall ECG abnormalities was higher in participants with CD (40.1%; 95%CIs=39.2-41.0) compared to non-CD (24.1%; 95%CIs=23.5-24.7) (OR=2.78; 95%CIs=2.37-3.26).

  • Among specific ECG abnormalities, prevalence of

    • complete right bundle branch block (RBBB) (OR=4.60; 95%CIs=2.97-7.11),
    • left anterior fascicular block (LAFB) (OR=1.60; 95%CIs=1.21-2.13),
    • combination of complete RBBB/LAFB (OR=3.34; 95%CIs=1.76-6.35),
    • first-degree atrioventricular block (A-V B) (OR=1.71; 95%CIs=1.25-2.33),
    • atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (OR=2.11; 95%CIs=1.40-3.19),
    • ventricular extrasystoles (VE) (OR=1.62; 95%CIs=1.14-2.30)

    was higher in CD compared to non-CD participants

Post-Conference Thoughts

Thoughts on the Final Results

  • High-performing teams often accepted very low accuracy in exchange for better recall/risk ranking.
  • Foundation/self-supervised ECG encoders (ViT/Transformer backbones, distilled/foundation models pretrained on large ECG corpora) are widely used.

Miscellaneous

CinC2020 | CinC2021 | CinC2022 | CinC2023 | CinC2024

Footnotes

  1. As clarified by the organizers, the validation set for the official phase was updated, hence the unofficial and official phase leaderboards are not comparable.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors