I haven't yet seen discussions around external MCP clients (outside of the browser context).

(Please let me know if I missed something in the current specification or subsequent discussions)

I could imagine users wanting to use their normal mcp client, like Claude Desktop / Code, Copilot, Cursor, etc. to interface with WebMCP.

The security model is clearly different than self-contained and prone to all the same attack vectors like prompt injection etc, and likely more dangerous due to potentially pre-approved commands etc.

All that being said, external permissions, e.g. webcam, microphone, etc are not unheard of in the browser.

Just wanted to bring this up- is this a goal or anti-goal of the proposal in its current form?