[Tracking]: JS -> TS refactor the remaining .js file to .ts and esm #7225
Description
What subject does this issue tracking?
JS -> TS
- refactor the remaining .js file to .ts
- remove all ts-expect-error
- use typescript rather than JSDocs
- It is best not to use default imports or exports,
"module": "nodenext"causes dynamic imports to be double default-wrapped - e.g.{ default: { default: Foo } }microsoft/TypeScript#59257 - aligned with webpack
### Rename to `.ts` file
- [ ] https://github.com/web-infra-dev/rspack/pull/7132
- [ ] https://github.com/web-infra-dev/rspack/pull/7136
- [x] packages/rspack/src/ModuleTypeConstants.js & packages/rspack/src/Template.js
- [x] packages/rspack/src/lib
- [x] packages/rspack/src/config
- [x] packages/rspack/src/util
- [x] packages/rspack/src/loader-runner
- [x] packages/rspack/src/builtin-plugin/css-extract/hmr
- [x] packages/rspack-dev-server/src/ansiHTML.js
Type Coverage
### Increase type coverage
- [x] src/lib/formatLocation.ts
- [x] src/logging/runtime.ts
- [x] src/util/webpack.ts
- [x] src/logging/truncateArgs.ts
- [x] src/node/nodeConsole.ts
- [x] src/builtin-plugin/EnableWasmLoadingPlugin.ts
- [x] src/builtin-plugin/EnableChunkLoadingPlugin.ts
- [x] src/util/memoize.ts
- [x] src/stats/StatsFactory.ts
---- 2024.09.21
Our main files have been completed, and on this basis, we can do some work to increase the type coverage
type coverage contribution guide is in #7225 (comment)
this issues is closed, but any pr that increases the type coverage is acceptable.