Followup Grant Proposal - Dot Marketplace Phase 3: Milestone updates with decentralized court + decentralized storage + advanced search#1205
Conversation
Noc2
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the application. I also pinged @takahser since he evaluated your previous deliveries. Regarding the current application, could you add more technical details? For example, will you implement a certain delivery as a pallet or UI or both, etc? Potentially it also makes sense to combine some of the milestones. For example milestones 3 and 4.
|
@Noc2 I've updated the requested details. To Summarise:
Kindly, check and let us know. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the update. I’m happy to mark it as ready for review and go ahead with it. But I suggest that for follow-up funding you either get in contact with VCs or consider applying for treasury funding in the future since our grants program is not the best tool for checking the long-term viability of an idea or business model.
|
Hi @Loaki07. Thank you for the application. Until now, I was under the impression that you are building the marketplace to run it yourself. The website suggests that you are merely advertising it for others to use. Is that correct? If so, have you had any success finding users? Do you have a business model behind building the pallets? In other words, are you planning to maintain the project after the grant? |
Hello @semuelle, We are applying for this Web3 Foundation grant to complete just the v1 tech roadmap. Post this development phase, we will hand over to our marketing team which will explore adoption with other projects. |
|
@semuelle @Noc2
|
|
|
||
| ### **Future Plans** | ||
|
|
||
| This is the last phase in our current roadmap. Post this we would focus on partnerships with chains on the dotsama ecosystem for integrating DotMarketplace as their native bounty management tool (this work has already started). If future, if the traction is great, we could create a fresh proposal for an excellent UI or integrate DotMarketplace within PolkaJS Apps itself with native support for multiple tokens besides DOT. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this work has already started
Can you update us on your progress here? In general, I agree with Sebastians comment that it would be nice to see some indication here that there is interest in the community to use your product.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we take this up over chat?
Would be happy to share messages exchanged with three projects.
As well as show the UI, I mentioned earlier.
Thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@abeoye Unless you already talked to @takahser, can you send them to grants@web3.foundation? Otherwise, let me know your matrix handle and I'll create a room for you to post them in.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @semuelle @takahser @Noc2 @alxs,
Invited you to this matrix room.
Thanks!
Co-authored-by: S E R A Y A <takahser@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: S E R A Y A <takahser@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: S E R A Y A <takahser@users.noreply.github.com>
semuelle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the update, @Loaki07. If you are not building it for yourself, then I'd be interested to know how you came up with the design, most notably the court. Fair and accepted dispute resolution is not implemented easily, and I'd imagine many projects/teams would have at least slight differences in opinion over what the process should look like, e.g. how jurors are selected. There might be some existing projects that could provide some experience/insight into what tripping hazards might hide behind your design, such as the Aragon Court. Have you looked into any?
|
We have implemented a task based dispute resolution model (described below, there is also a flow chart). However, based on the partners or clients we are open to variations that are preferred/agreed upon.
|
Not a critical issue in the application, but I'd say there should be some official, public way for jurors to ask both parties questions and for customer and worker to reply and possibly submit supplementary material.
Not an expert, but rewarding jurors to vote with the majority sounds like a gateway for collusion. Other than the issue raised here, happy to proceed. |
This is a good suggestion, we can provide video conferencing services such as gmeet, zoom, ..etc. that can be integrated. There is already a feature to upload documents for review. To take it a step further we could add a RBAC forum page for the case discussions. However, this is currently out of scope.
True. It encourages fair judgement & further involvement in future cases by the jurors when they are equally paid. |
Noc2
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Still happy to go ahead with it.
alxs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm happy to approve this too, but I agree with the sentiment that it might be time for you to move to treasury or obtain funding from other sources after this grant.
semuelle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the info. Hope it works out!
|
Congratulations and welcome to the Web3 Foundation Grants Program! Please refer to our Milestone Delivery repository for instructions on how to submit milestones and invoices, our FAQ for frequently asked questions and the support section of our README for more ways to find answers to your questions. |
Project Abstract
Grant level
Application Checklist
project_name.md).