Skip to content

add DNFT milestone1#213

Closed
bleemer4 wants to merge 3 commits intow3f:masterfrom
DNFT-Team:master
Closed

add DNFT milestone1#213
bleemer4 wants to merge 3 commits intow3f:masterfrom
DNFT-Team:master

Conversation

@bleemer4
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bleemer4 bleemer4 commented Jul 4, 2021

Milestone Delivery Checklist

@bleemer4 bleemer4 mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2021
5 tasks
@Noc2 Noc2 self-assigned this Jul 5, 2021
@semuelle
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

semuelle commented Jul 5, 2021

Thank you for the delivery, @bleemer4. We will look into it as soon as possible. In the meantime, could you add links for the deliverables 0a-d to the table of deliverables? Thanks!

@Noc2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Noc2 commented Jul 6, 2021

@bleemer4 Thanks again for the delivery. I started to look into it. Could you take a look at my evaluation here and let me know if you have any questions? Also could you explain what you mean with nft2006?

@alxs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

alxs commented Jul 21, 2021

@bleemer4 any updates here?

@bleemer4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@bleemer4 any updates here?

yep, we will submit a detailed version this week

@bleemer4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@bleemer4 Thanks again for the delivery. I started to look into it. Could you take a look at my evaluation here and let me know if you have any questions? Also could you explain what you mean with nft2006?

Hi, @Noc2 , the EIP 2006 link you mentioned is the submit record, our NFT2006(ERC2006) is set to a new ERC standard. To make clear, we're trying to make solidity version of ERC2006, and a video introduction. we'll submit a full version covering the question you mentioned soon.

@bleemer4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thank you for the delivery, @bleemer4. We will look into it as soon as possible. In the meantime, could you add links for the deliverables 0a-d to the table of deliverables? Thanks!

Fine, will do.

@Noc2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Noc2 commented Aug 11, 2021

@bleemer4 any updates here?

yep, we will submit a detailed version this week

@bleemer4 Any updates? It’s now over three weeks.

@bleemer4
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

bleemer4 commented Aug 16, 2021

@bleemer4 any updates here?

yep, we will submit a detailed version this week

@bleemer4 Any updates? It’s now over three weeks.

We have updated more detail.
Node & front Repo have been updated.

  1. Project Intro Vedio link: https://youtu.be/HkQorjfe4Z8
  2. Substrate MVP Product Vedio link: https://youtu.be/_vHdjrVKNkg
  3. Project Doc: https://dnft.gitbook.io/dnft/
  4. About ERC2006:
    It's a new ERC token(NFT) standard towards AI Data/Model we want to propose, facing 3 problems when dealing AI Data/Model with the NFT solutions:
    1)Data type&content massive.When we usually come up with a conception of "data set", it's different with the common NFT ways, handling a NFT with a pic, gif.etc.
    2)Public/Organization Data copyright. Public/Organization assets can be handled by MultiSign. When it comes to NFT, equity fragmentation may be a solution.
    3) Privacy protection, as we all know, NFT with a metadata link , which can be seen by anyone. We want to update the metadata with encryption algorithm, MPC, ZKP, which we called encrypted NFT.
    More details, please refer https://dnft.gitbook.io/dnft/erc-nft-2006-standard.

@Noc2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Noc2 commented Aug 16, 2021

Thanks for the update. It looks much better now. I have two follow-up comments/questions:

  • I guess you are still working on integrating more tests, correct?
  • Regarding ERC2006 or NFT2006, how did you come up with the name? The name is usually based on the github pull request number to the following repo: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs (at least that’s the case for all other standards). Because of this, the name is quite confusing.

@semuelle
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

semuelle commented Sep 2, 2021

@bleemer4 Were you able to reproduce and fix the issues David had with the building? And could you answer the questions in his last comment?

@mmagician
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bleemer4 We haven't heard from you in almost a month now. Please let us know if you are planning to complete the work, otherwise we will close this PR and terminate the grant if we don't hear back from you within the next 2 weeks.

@mmagician mmagician closed this Sep 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants