@martinthomson voiced concerns about unlinkable revocation methods such as Cryptographic Accumulators being widely applicable enough to make them part of the protocol registry inclusion criteria for privacy.
I don't have enough practical experience on this topic to decide - so I'm opening this issue for discussion.
@martinthomson voiced concerns about unlinkable revocation methods such as Cryptographic Accumulators being widely applicable enough to make them part of the protocol registry inclusion criteria for privacy.
I don't have enough practical experience on this topic to decide - so I'm opening this issue for discussion.