Skip to content

[Registry] Re-evaluate "freely available" requirement #214

@timcappalli

Description

@timcappalli

As per the 2025-04-11 hybrid meeting discussion, this issue is to track future re-evaluation of the "freely available" requirement in the registry inclusion criteria as discussions between W3C and ISO continue and when ISO 18013-7 Annex C meets the other requirements to be added to the registry (protocol identifier, etc).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions