Skip to content

reorganized section 7.1.2 for issue 2269#2291

Merged
mattgarrish merged 3 commits intomainfrom
editorial/icb-normative-statements-issue2269
May 18, 2022
Merged

reorganized section 7.1.2 for issue 2269#2291
mattgarrish merged 3 commits intomainfrom
editorial/icb-normative-statements-issue2269

Conversation

@iherman
Copy link
Member

@iherman iherman commented May 14, 2022

Implementing the consensus reached in #2269. In doing so, I have also added an @id value for the first MUST statement in view of an upcoming test, as well to the second paragraph for a possible test (it is a MAY, so there may not be an extra test).

Fix #2269

See:

@iherman iherman requested review from dlazin and mattgarrish May 14, 2022 07:37
@iherman
Copy link
Member Author

iherman commented May 14, 2022

I will not be around next week; if this is o.k., merge it, do not wait for me.

@mattgarrish mattgarrish merged commit 86ceba6 into main May 18, 2022
@mattgarrish mattgarrish deleted the editorial/icb-normative-statements-issue2269 branch May 18, 2022 11:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Redundant ICB normative statements?

2 participants