Skip to content

Changed the term 'risky' to 'under-implemented'#1976

Merged
dauwhe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
use-under-implemented
Jan 26, 2022
Merged

Changed the term 'risky' to 'under-implemented'#1976
dauwhe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
use-under-implemented

Conversation

@iherman
Copy link
Member

@iherman iherman commented Jan 21, 2022

@mattgarrish
Copy link
Member

mattgarrish commented Jan 22, 2022

I don't care that much what we settle on, but was it considered that the features are going to have to have " (Under-implemented)" tacked onto their titles, and it will consequently appear in table of contents? That's a pretty wordy label.

@iherman
Copy link
Member Author

iherman commented Jan 23, 2022

I don't care that much what we settle on, but was it considered that the features are going to have to have " (Under-implemented)" tacked onto their titles, and it will consequently appear in table of contents? That's a pretty wordy label.

Yes, that is the consequence... (and no, it was not considered, as far as I can see on the minutes) but I would say let us lie with this for now and see later if it becomes way too ugly...

@dauwhe dauwhe merged commit e021410 into main Jan 26, 2022
@dauwhe dauwhe deleted the use-under-implemented branch January 26, 2022 13:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

What happens to features that do not get enough implementation in CR?

5 participants