Please Indicate One:

• Editorial
• Question
• Feedback
• Blocking Issue
• Non-Blocking Issue

Re #416 #504 #514 #515, I think this deserves a general issue to address the issue at hand.

I would like to point to #514 (comment) by @nightpool

Our OWL schema is non-normative and best-effort, and not maintained by the working group

I find this unfortunate and hard to understand. The JSON-LD only provides the minimum term mappings. Does it mean that the only normative reference for the property domains/ranges, class hierarchy, etc is the HTML respec document? If only it had RDFa annotations...

Right now, however, the normative reference is not really machine-readable, with the spec document being predominantly targeted at human readers.

I'd kindly ask the group to actually maintain the OWL, or similar form of accurate semantic representation of the Activity Streams vocabulary.