Merged
Conversation
6199874 to
63ba740
Compare
vormwald
approved these changes
Feb 28, 2025
Owner
vormwald
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, love it thanks for the PR 🙌
Contributor
Author
|
@vormwald Great! Could you please push the new release to rubygems? I don't see it at https://rubygems.org/gems/jekyll-tailwindcss/ |
Owner
|
🤔 Not sure what happened when I pushed it up last time. It's available now though! Thanks for the ping. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi! Thanks for the Tailwind v4 update!
Unfortunately, there is an error when v4 is used without a config file but with an official plugin.
According to the installation instructions, typography plugin https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss-typography is imported as:
Which has the substring
@tailwindcsswhich triggers the v3 check.If needed, I can make the check a bit smarter, but maybe it is ok as it is.