This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 28, 2024. It is now read-only.
Allow ChildReconciler to opt-in to dangerous children#455
Closed
scothis wants to merge 1 commit intovmware-labs:mainfrom
scothis:danger-duck
Closed
Allow ChildReconciler to opt-in to dangerous children#455scothis wants to merge 1 commit intovmware-labs:mainfrom scothis:danger-duck
scothis wants to merge 1 commit intovmware-labs:mainfrom
scothis:danger-duck
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #455 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 60.67% 60.43% -0.24%
==========================================
Files 26 26
Lines 2543 2563 +20
==========================================
+ Hits 1543 1549 +6
- Misses 911 924 +13
- Partials 89 90 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Contributor
|
Still want to review this, just so you know, we haven't forgotten it :D |
Duck types represent a partial view of a resource. It is dangerous to perform operation that assume the client has the full resource when it only has a portion of the resource. Calling update in this case can result in data loss as fields that are not part of the duck type will be dropped on the server. Likewise, it is difficult to create a resource with a partial object as required/essential fields may not be available. This change allows users to explicitly override these concerns and use the ChildReconciler and ChildSetReconciler to manage a child via a duck type. This should only be done when the user is certain the duck typed object contains all fields represented on the resource. Signed-off-by: Scott Andrews <andrewssc@vmware.com>
Contributor
|
I'm leaving this pending until I have time to evaluate it with something real world. I like this solution a lot, for my very specific usecase, but adding something dangerous only to satisfy my use case might be selfish. |
This was referenced Mar 26, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
Migrated to reconcilerio/runtime#506 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Duck types represent a partial view of a resource. It is dangerous to perform operation that assume the client has the full resource when it only has a portion of the resource. Calling update in this case can result in data loss as fields that are not part of the duck type will be dropped on the server. Likewise, it is difficult to create a resource with a partial object as required/essential fields may not be available.
This change allows users to explicitly override these concerns and use the ChildReconciler and ChildSetReconciler to manage a child via a duck type. This should only be done when the user is certain the duck typed object contains all fields represented on the resource.