Skip to content

refactor: directly express required state#296

Merged
tenthirtyam merged 1 commit intomainfrom
refactor/directly-express-required-state
Apr 28, 2025
Merged

refactor: directly express required state#296
tenthirtyam merged 1 commit intomainfrom
refactor/directly-express-required-state

Conversation

@tenthirtyam
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

While functionally identical, the updated form is generally preferred because it's often considered more readable and directly expresses the required state of the variable. ref: De Morgan's laws.

While functionally identical, the updated form is generally preferred because it's often considered more readable and directly expresses the required state of the variable. ref: De Morgan's laws.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Johnson <ryan.johnson@broadcom.com>
@tenthirtyam tenthirtyam added this to the v1.1.1 milestone Apr 28, 2025
@tenthirtyam tenthirtyam self-assigned this Apr 28, 2025
@tenthirtyam tenthirtyam requested a review from a team as a code owner April 28, 2025 00:40
@tenthirtyam tenthirtyam merged commit 08b684c into main Apr 28, 2025
14 checks passed
@tenthirtyam tenthirtyam deleted the refactor/directly-express-required-state branch April 28, 2025 16:16
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 30, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants