fix(resolve): skip module field when the importer is a require call#7438
Merged
patak-cat merged 1 commit intovitejs:mainfrom Mar 24, 2022
Merged
fix(resolve): skip module field when the importer is a require call#7438patak-cat merged 1 commit intovitejs:mainfrom
module field when the importer is a require call#7438patak-cat merged 1 commit intovitejs:mainfrom
Conversation
Fixes vitejs#7053 I used a `require-pkg-with-module-field` package in the test, instead of `json-bigint`, because I need to pin the `bignumber.js` version to 9.0.2 in case it changed its `package.json` in future releases.
patak-cat
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2022
7 tasks
7 tasks
9 tasks
7 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes #7053
Additional context
I used a
require-pkg-with-module-fieldpackage in the test, instead ofjson-bigint, because I need to pin thebignumber.jsversion to 9.0.2in case it changed its
package.jsonin future releases.What is the purpose of this pull request?
Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following
fixes #123).