Skip to content

fix: avoid mangling code from incorrect magic-string usage#7397

Merged
patak-cat merged 1 commit into
vitejs:mainfrom
benmccann:magic-string
Mar 21, 2022
Merged

fix: avoid mangling code from incorrect magic-string usage#7397
patak-cat merged 1 commit into
vitejs:mainfrom
benmccann:magic-string

Conversation

@benmccann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

Fixes #7365

The current default in magic-string seems like a bit of a footgun. Until / unless the default is changed (Rich-Harris/magic-string#211), we should manually specify contentOnly: true

Additional context

This is causing difficult to diagnose errors in SvelteKit with SvelteKit itself giving errors like "Method not allowed" due to incorrectly compiled .js files


What is the purpose of this pull request?

  • Bug fix
  • New Feature
  • Documentation update
  • Other

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • Read the Contributing Guidelines.
  • Read the Pull Request Guidelines and follow the Commit Convention.
  • Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
  • Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. fixes #123).
  • Ideally, include relevant tests that fail without this PR but pass with it.

@benmccann benmccann added bug p3-minor-bug An edge case that only affects very specific usage (priority) labels Mar 21, 2022

@bluwy bluwy left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I don't think there are places where we'd expect the contentOnly: false behaviour. And the tests passed too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

p3-minor-bug An edge case that only affects very specific usage (priority)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SSR transform loses Object.defineProperty in certain cases

3 participants