fix(plugin-legacy): require Vite 2.8.0 (#6272)#6869
Merged
patak-cat merged 1 commit intovitejs:mainfrom Feb 11, 2022
Merged
Conversation
9 tasks
Contributor
Author
|
I didn't bump the version of the legacy plugin, but I believe the next step would be to make a new release to carry this out, since it's technically a bug fix at this point. |
Niputi
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2022
patak-cat
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2022
Member
|
Good opportunity to test our new GitHub workflow based release action 🤞🏼 |
Member
|
It kind of worked! First successful release of vitebot in npm. But I had to commit by hand the changelog. But it is done @agriffis, thanks for taking care of this, check plugin-legacy@1.7.1 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Now that the changes in #6272 have been released in Vite proper, the legacy plugin's peer dep needs to reflect that.
Additional context
See conversation starting at #6272 (comment)