fix: ignore sideEffects for scripts imported from html#12786
Merged
Conversation
|
|
7 tasks
bluwy
reviewed
Apr 7, 2023
Member
bluwy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense to me, but would be great to have tests 😬
Member
Author
|
Done, thanks for the push ❤️ |
|
Let me know when this appears in a beta so I can add it to my PR. thanks for working on this! |
Member
Author
|
@fregante released in vite@4.3.0-beta.4 |
|
Success! 38KB |
3 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #10735
Description
It seems that adding
moduleSideEffects: falseto scripts imported from .HTML files pushes rollup to tree shake everything. Because"sideEffects": falseis set in the package.json of the app, we end up doing this for every file.This fix works for this reproduction: #10735 (comment)
I don't know if the fix should be more generic though. We could do this as a stop-gap if no one has a better idea here.
What is the purpose of this pull request?