Skip to content

Conversation

@sellout
Copy link
Contributor

@sellout sellout commented Aug 6, 2025

Overview

Not sure if this is a win, but I had the sitting in a stash, so figured I’d let someone else decide.

It also turns the comments on the affected data decl into Haddock.

Interesting/controversial decisions

It separates out a deriving clause into multiple standalone deriving decls, which is more verbose.

Test coverage

It’s a straight-up refactor. Everything continues to pass.

Loose ends

The remaining ORMOLU_DISABLE is more entangled, so I don’t see it going anywhere.

The other one is more entangled, but this one just required breaking out
some derived instances.

Not sure if this is a win, but I had the sitting in a stash, so figured
I’d let someone else decide.

It also turns the comments on the affected `data` decl into Haddock.
Copy link
Contributor

@aryairani aryairani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure

@aryairani aryairani merged commit e2b2497 into unisonweb:trunk Aug 6, 2025
17 checks passed
@sellout sellout deleted the remove-ORMOLU_DISABLE branch August 28, 2025 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants