🧪 [testing improvement] Cover image function in mcp.rs#20
Conversation
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
🎯 What: The testing gap in
crates/poke-around/src/mcp.rs:635for theimagefunction has been addressed. The function delegates tors_peekabooto take screenshots and returns the metadata along with base64 encoded image content in JSON format.📊 Coverage: Two scenarios are now tested:
image_should_return_mcp_image_content: Verifies the default execution with empty arguments (modedefaults to "screen").image_with_args_should_return_mcp_image_content: Verifies the execution with specific arguments (custommode,path, andretinaoptions).Both tests correctly account for CI headless environments lacking X server or screenshot tools by verifying the appropriate errors.
✨ Result: Test coverage for
mcp.rsis improved, ensuring the screenshot delegation and formatting correctly constructs MCP image responses or propagates the relevant errors.PR created automatically by Jules for task 601036105297890786 started by @undivisible