🧪 testing improvement: Add execute_tool error tests#11
Conversation
Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🧪 What: The testing gap addressed was testing error handling in
execute_tool.📊 Coverage: Added tests to assert proper JSON responses and structure when an unknown tool is provided, and proper
Errorpropagation when tool execution internally fails (like an IO error).✨ Result: The codebase's test coverage was increased and now asserts correct
execute_toolbehavior in failure cases.PR created automatically by Jules for task 17067963311098050498 started by @undivisible