🧹 Refactor: Extract sync retry logic in bridge.rs#10
Conversation
…helper functions. * Extract `perform_sync_attempt` to handle the `runner.sync_tools()` call. * Extract `handle_sync_retry` to handle sleep/retry logic. * Flatten the loop structure in `sync_and_report_tools` by using the new helper functions. Co-authored-by: google-labs-jules[bot] <161369871+google-labs-jules[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: Extracted nested logic in
crates/poke-around/src/bridge.rs(sync_and_report_tools) into two new functions:perform_sync_attemptandhandle_sync_retry.💡 Why: To reduce cognitive load and deeply nested control flow in the primary function, thereby improving maintainability and readability.
✅ Verification: Ran
cargo testandcargo check. Verified the test suite passes completely, confirming the refactoring did not alter external behavior. Code review confirmed#Correct#.✨ Result: The function
sync_and_report_toolsis now significantly flatter and easier to understand, directly addressing the deeply nested code health issue.PR created automatically by Jules for task 9455237144042724666 started by @undivisible