Inconsistency between conic gradients in PNG/SVG and PDF #7890
Description
Description
Discord thread: https://discord.com/channels/1054443721975922748/1239578999664152699/1473376620550291559
With the switch to krilla, the way conic gradients in PDF adapt to the container aspect ratio has changed:
0.13 |
0.14/main |
|---|---|
 |
 |
Source code
#grid(
columns: 2,
gutter: 5pt,
rect(width: 70pt, height: 70pt, fill: gradient.linear(angle: 135deg, ..color.map.turbo)),
rect(width: 25pt, height: 70pt, fill: gradient.linear(angle: 135deg, ..color.map.turbo)),
rect(width: 70pt, height: 25pt, fill: gradient.linear(angle: 135deg, ..color.map.turbo)),
)
#grid(
columns: 2,
gutter: 5pt,
rect(width: 70pt, height: 70pt, fill: gradient.conic(angle: 135deg, ..color.map.turbo)),
rect(width: 25pt, height: 70pt, fill: gradient.conic(angle: 135deg, ..color.map.turbo)),
rect(width: 70pt, height: 25pt, fill: gradient.conic(angle: 135deg, ..color.map.turbo)),
)
#grid(
columns: 2,
gutter: 5pt,
rect(width: 70pt, height: 70pt, fill: gradient.radial(..color.map.turbo)),
rect(width: 25pt, height: 70pt, fill: gradient.radial(..color.map.turbo)),
rect(width: 70pt, height: 25pt, fill: gradient.radial(..color.map.turbo)),
)The output of PNG and SVG aligns with the 0.13 PDF, and the different export formats should be visually the same. The question is what behavior we actually want.
Was the old behavior intentional? Because it seems like aspect ratio correction is applied in reverse. If no correction was applied at all, the 45deg angle should exactly meet the corner of the container.
Pinging @LaurenzV @Dherse (feel free to ignore if you're buisy)
Operating system
No response
Typst version
- I am using the latest version of Typst