Skip to content

Moving from gauge to tasty-bench#449

Merged
tbagrel1 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
tbagrel1/moving-to-tasty-bench
May 3, 2023
Merged

Moving from gauge to tasty-bench#449
tbagrel1 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
tbagrel1/moving-to-tasty-bench

Conversation

@tbagrel1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tbagrel1 tbagrel1 commented May 3, 2023

This commit replaces the gauge benchmark framework with tasty-bench for the linear-base:bench target. The API is the same in both tools, so the change is mostly transparent.

@tbagrel1 tbagrel1 requested a review from aspiwack May 3, 2023 07:47
Comment on lines -10 to +11
[ hmbench,
Array.benchmarks
[ Array.benchmarks,
HashMap.benchmarks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason for switching these two around?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added some consistency around the import naming scheme, and I reordered them to follow both alphabetical order and the import order.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see much value in alphabetical ordering of the benchmarks. But it doesn't hurt either, I suppose.

Comment on lines -10 to +11
[ hmbench,
Array.benchmarks
[ Array.benchmarks,
HashMap.benchmarks
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see much value in alphabetical ordering of the benchmarks. But it doesn't hurt either, I suppose.

@tbagrel1 tbagrel1 merged commit 700d31f into master May 3, 2023
@tbagrel1 tbagrel1 deleted the tbagrel1/moving-to-tasty-bench branch May 3, 2023 10:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants