Hi there! I was looking into tree-sitter out of curiousity, and while messing about with it, I noticed that the doc-comments in the generated Rust bindings were formatted a little oddly.

I thought to tidy up the doc-comments a little. In particular, I did the following things:

• I removed a couple useless [] which appear after the text portion of a link. For example, [tree-sitter][] became [tree-sitter]. Thanks to how markdown handles reference-style links, these still link to the same place.

• Where a link refers to a item (such as a struct or const), I changed the link's text to be in backticks, such that it shows up in a in-line code block. For example, [Parser] became [`Parser`]. This brings item links in line with how many Rust crates link to items.

• I changed the link to tree_sitter::Parser to include the exact version of the tree_sitter crate used by the binding crate, rather than version *. This ensures that the linked documentation links to the relevant version of the crate (whether the relevant version is the latest version or not).

• I removed the reference link definition for tree_sitter_language::LanguageFn. This causes rustdoc to link to the LanguageFn item that's already in scope - which incidentally also ensures that the link will go to the exact version of tree_sitter_language used by the binding crate.

This should not result in any functional or visual differences to the doc (aside from the LANGUAGE and Parser links now looking like in-line code blocks).