Skip to content

fix(sample-app): lint fix #3522

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
nina-kollman merged 2 commits into from
Dec 16, 2025
Merged

fix(sample-app): lint fix #3522

nina-kollman merged 2 commits into from
Dec 16, 2025

Conversation

@nina-kollman
Copy link
Contributor

@nina-kollman nina-kollman commented Dec 16, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

  • I have added tests that cover my changes.
  • If adding a new instrumentation or changing an existing one, I've added screenshots from some observability platform showing the change.
  • PR name follows conventional commits format: feat(instrumentation): ... or fix(instrumentation): ....
  • (If applicable) I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Important

Fixes line break in personal_info_system_prompt string in guardrail_medical_chat_example.py for lint compliance.

  • Lint Fix:
    • Fixes line break in personal_info_system_prompt string in guardrail_medical_chat_example.py to comply with linting standards.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 1d131be. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Internal code formatting and cleanup improvements applied to medical chat example, including minor string adjustments and decorator refinements. No changes to user-facing functionality or behavior.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

A sample application file underwent formatting refinements and minor string adjustments. Changes include consolidating function calls, adjusting error message wrapping, adding trailing commas to decorator arguments, and standardizing quotation marks. No functional logic or control flow modifications were introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Formatting and String Adjustments
packages/sample-app/sample_app/guardrail_medical_chat_example.py		 Consolidated Traceloop.init into a single line, wrapped OPENAI_API_KEY error message for readability, added trailing commas to decorator arguments, standardized quotation marks in quit command list, and reflowed prompt strings. No behavioral changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Note: The manifest file analyzer assessment of "High" appears inconsistent with the change description, which indicates primarily cosmetic formatting adjustments with no logic modifications. Review effort is low due to the absence of control flow changes, functional logic edits, or multi-file refactoring.

Poem

🐰 A little hop through formatting lines,
Trailing commas and quotation signs,
No logic bent, just polish bright,
The code now reads more neat and right! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'fix(sample): lint fix' is vague and generic. While it indicates a 'fix' category and mentions 'sample', the phrase 'lint fix' does not convey meaningful information about the actual changes (formatting and string adjustments in a guardrail medical chat example file). Use a more descriptive title that specifies what was fixed, such as 'fix(sample): clean up formatting in medical chat guardrail example' or similar.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch nk/lint_fix

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@doronkopit5 doronkopit5 changed the title fix(sample): lint fix fix(sample-app): lint fix Dec 16, 2025
ellipsis-dev[bot]
ellipsis-dev bot reviewed Dec 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Changes requested ❌

Reviewed everything up to 1d131be in 1 minute and 40 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 15 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

Workflow ID: wflow_vK4isywqkkmlZpJW

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@nina-kollman nina-kollman merged commit 34bb042 into main Dec 16, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev[bot] ellipsis-dev[bot] left review comments

@doronkopit5 doronkopit5 doronkopit5 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@nina-kollman @doronkopit5