test: Large file handling#351
Merged
Merged
Conversation
AndrewSouthpaw
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2026
AndrewSouthpaw
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! Cool to see all your hard work paying off. 😄
Contributor
Author
|
Yeap it was surprising that it has made as much of an improvement as it has been. Rename is done. |
AndrewSouthpaw
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #258
We now run a test against a file with 45k lines, 2k headings & 2.5mb to see how it behaves with such a file.
This test is completing within a matter of seconds (tap has a 30second limit) hence recent changes are resulting in efficient handling.