Merged
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedMore than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review. 37 files out of 144 files are above the max files limit of 100. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits. You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
✅ Deploy Preview for testcontainers-dotnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
This was referenced Nov 17, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This PR adds support for .NET 10 and drops
net462. I checked the transitive dependencies, and almost none of them supportnet462. Since only a few lines of code in some modules actually build with it, there's little benefit in keeping it compared to the extra overhead and maintenance complexity. It requires additional polyfills and workarounds for missing APIs (to fully support it), which I'd like to reduce/avoid.If there are significant benefits I'm overlooking, we can add the support again.
The PR is blocked by: kurrent-io/KurrentDB-Client-Dotnet#372.
Why is it important?
-
Related issues
-