Run pytest targets without compiling#50163
Closed
bhack wants to merge 2 commits intotensorflow:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
This LGTM, but waiting on Austin and Jason too. |
Contributor
Author
|
What we need to do to use python files in the checkout other then tests? |
Contributor
Author
|
@mihaimaruseac Thanks for the review but I am going to close this as in TF bazel BUILD files we don't have a clear separation between python an c++ targets. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will add a specific
--targetsflag to specific user test targets.E.g.
./tensorflow/tools/ci_build/builds/run_pip_tests.sh --targets /tensorflow/python/eager:def_function_test./tensorflow/tools/ci_build/builds/run_pip_tests.sh --targets /tensorflow/python/eager:allSee https://discuss.tensorflow.org/t/run-python-tests-without-compiling-tf
/cc @angerson @perfinion @mihaimaruseac What kind of extra checks we need to add to promote this in Doc as a temp workaround for python PRs?