Summary

ref: #5969 (review)

I guess the only qualm I have is that we have two stats that we use to keep track of peer behavior (votes and blocks) but the peer manager is never informed when anything bad happens i.e. invalid proposal or invalid vote.

While the peer manager and scoring system is still, at this moment, being fleshed out, we should consider if it is worthwhile to introduce stats, and as a result, peer updates to adjust peers scores when a given peer sends an invalid proposal or vote.

Currently, we only track "good" behavior and not any "bad" behavior.

/cc @cmwaters @ebuchman @brapse @melekes

For Admin Use

• Not duplicate issue
• Appropriate labels applied
• Appropriate contributors tagged
• Contributor assigned/self-assigned