Skip to content

Tendermint on non-deterministic signatures #1664

@ValarDragon

Description

@ValarDragon

Tendermint's logic hasn't been vetted for non-deterministic signatures. It needs to be investigated if the current logic holds for non-determinstic signatures. The signer can always create multiple valid signatures on the same message in both secp and ed25519

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

C:consensusComponent: ConsensusC:docsComponent: DocumentationT:securityType: Security (specify priority)T:testType: Tests that need lovestalefor use by stalebot

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions