Skip to content

ci(e2e): trigger e2e on .github/scripts changes#2623

Merged
zakisk merged 1 commit intotektoncd:mainfrom
zakisk:run-e2e-on-scripts-changes
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

ci(e2e): trigger e2e on .github/scripts changes#2623
zakisk merged 1 commit intotektoncd:mainfrom
zakisk:run-e2e-on-scripts-changes

Conversation

@zakisk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@zakisk zakisk commented Mar 30, 2026

trigger e2e on .github/scripts/** changes

📝 Description of the Change

🔗 Linked GitHub Issue

Fixes #

🧪 Testing Strategy

  • Unit tests
  • Integration tests
  • End-to-end tests
  • Manual testing
  • Not Applicable

🤖 AI Assistance

AI assistance can be used for various tasks, such as code generation,
documentation, or testing.

Please indicate whether you have used AI assistance
for this PR and provide details if applicable.

  • I have not used any AI assistance for this PR.
  • I have used AI assistance for this PR.

Important

Slop will be simply rejected, if you are using AI assistance you need to make sure you
understand the code generated and that it meets the project's standards. you
need at least know how to run the code and deploy it (if needed). See
startpaac to make it easy
to deploy and test your code changes.

If the majority of the code in this PR was generated by an AI, please add a Co-authored-by trailer to your commit message.
For example:

Co-authored-by: Claude noreply@anthropic.com

✅ Submitter Checklist

  • 📝 My commit messages are clear, informative, and follow the project's How to write a git commit message guide. The Gitlint linter ensures in CI it's properly validated
  • ✨ I have ensured my commit message prefix (e.g., fix:, feat:) matches the "Type of Change" I selected above.
  • ♽ I have run make test and make lint locally to check for and fix any
    issues. For an efficient workflow, I have considered installing
    pre-commit and running pre-commit install to
    automate these checks.
  • 📖 I have added or updated documentation for any user-facing changes.
  • 🧪 I have added sufficient unit tests for my code changes.
  • 🎁 I have added end-to-end tests where feasible. See README for more details.
  • 🔎 I have addressed any CI test flakiness or provided a clear reason to bypass it.
  • If adding a provider feature, I have filled in the following and updated the provider documentation:
    • GitHub App
    • GitHub Webhook
    • Gitea/Forgejo
    • GitLab
    • Bitbucket Cloud
    • Bitbucket Data Center

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

trigger e2e on .github/scripts/** changes

Signed-off-by: Zaki Shaikh <zashaikh@redhat.com>
@zakisk zakisk force-pushed the run-e2e-on-scripts-changes branch from 09da872 to 389f2f4 Compare March 30, 2026 12:37
@zakisk zakisk merged commit 33c6fae into tektoncd:main Mar 30, 2026
12 checks passed
@zakisk zakisk deleted the run-e2e-on-scripts-changes branch March 30, 2026 13:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants