Skip to content

ci: run after Format workflow #425

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
tcheeric merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

ci: run after Format workflow #425

tcheeric merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2025

Conversation

@tcheeric
Copy link
Owner

@tcheeric tcheeric commented Aug 28, 2025

Why now?

  • Align CI pipeline to run only after the Format workflow completes successfully.
    Related issue: #0

What changed?

  • Trigger CI on completion of the Format workflow and guard job execution on successful runs.

BREAKING

  • None.

Review focus

  • Validate workflow trigger and job condition.

Checklist

  • Scope ≤ 300 lines (or split/stack)
  • Title is verb + object (e.g., “Refactor auth middleware to async”)
  • Description links the issue and answers “why now?”
  • BREAKING flagged if needed
  • Tests/docs updated (if relevant)

Testing

  • ./mvnw -q verify (failed: Network is unreachable)
Exception in thread "main" java.net.SocketException: Network is unreachable
        at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect0(Native Method)
        at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:589)
        at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:578)
        at java.base/sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl.connect(NioSocketImpl.java:583)
        at java.base/java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(SocksSocketImpl.java:327)
        at java.base/java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:751)
        at java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.connect(SSLSocketImpl.java:304)
        at java.base/sun.security.ssl.BaseSSLSocketImpl.connect(BaseSSLSocketImpl.java:181)
        at java.base/sun.net.NetworkClient.doConnect(NetworkClient.java:183)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:531)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.openServer(HttpClient.java:636)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsClient.<init>(HttpsClient.java:264)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsClient.New(HttpsClient.java:377)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.https.AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.getNewHttpClient(AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.java:193)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.plainConnect0(HttpURLConnection.java:1237)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.plainConnect(HttpURLConnection.java:1123)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.https.AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.connect(AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.java:179)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream0(HttpURLConnection.java:1675)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:1599)
        at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getInputStream(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java:223)
        at org.apache.maven.wrapper.DefaultDownloader.downloadInternal(DefaultDownloader.java:106)
        at org.apache.maven.wrapper.DefaultDownloader.download(DefaultDownloader.java:93)
        at org.apache.maven.wrapper.Installer.createDist(Installer.java:86)
        at org.apache.maven.wrapper.WrapperExecutor.execute(WrapperExecutor.java:155)
        at org.apache.maven.wrapper.MavenWrapperMain.main(MavenWrapperMain.java:72)

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_b_68b0a1263db083318c69d31cb8aba63d

@tcheeric tcheeric merged commit d35c035 into develop Aug 28, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@tcheeric tcheeric deleted the codex/update-ci-triggers-in-ci.yml branch August 28, 2025 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

codex

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@tcheeric