Continuing discussion from #301 (comment)

(Not related to timing of the PR, we can do either a followup on this proposal or a needs-consensus patch on ecma262. Either is fine with me.)

I see foo?.#baz support as being just another form of foo?.bar.#baz. I think developers will end up being confused why they can do one syntax but not the other. Private field access feels like it is just part of the chain, no matter where that chain starts.