Skip to content

Conversation

@ssahani
Copy link
Contributor

@ssahani ssahani commented Dec 18, 2020

It requires a testing /. will do that.

@bluca
Copy link
Member

bluca commented Dec 21, 2020

It requires a testing /. will do that.

Have you done the testing now?

@ssahani
Copy link
Contributor Author

ssahani commented Dec 22, 2020

It requires a testing /. will do that.

Have you done the testing now?

On vacation goa india away from kb. Sorry will do .

@bluca
Copy link
Member

bluca commented Dec 22, 2020

It requires a testing /. will do that.

Have you done the testing now?

On vacation goa india away from kb. Sorry will do .

No problem at all and no rush, just checking. Enjoy your vacation!

@yuwata
Copy link
Member

yuwata commented Dec 24, 2020

I force-pushed to add a fix for memleak. I will also add a test case for this later. So, please do not merge this yet.

@yuwata
Copy link
Member

yuwata commented Dec 24, 2020

@ssahani and @bluca I added several tests for the new settings. While that, I found several issues, and the fixes for them are also included in this PR now. Furthermore, I added RouterAllowList= and RouterDenyList=. PTAL.

@yuwata yuwata force-pushed the route-allow-list branch 2 times, most recently from 9806d06 to 5a81e9a Compare December 24, 2020 05:41
@bluca bluca added good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍 PR is good to merge, but CI hasn't passed at time of review. Please merge if you see CI has passed and removed needs-review labels Dec 24, 2020
@yuwata yuwata merged commit b945573 into systemd:master Dec 24, 2020
@ssahani ssahani deleted the route-allow-list branch December 25, 2020 13:29
@ssahani
Copy link
Contributor Author

ssahani commented Dec 25, 2020

Thanks @bluca and @yuwata

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

good-to-merge/waiting-for-ci 👍 PR is good to merge, but CI hasn't passed at time of review. Please merge if you see CI has passed network

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants