Skip to content

Fix heap-after-use between PROXYSQL INTERNAL SESSION and SHOW PROCESSLIST#5191

Merged
renecannao merged 3 commits intov3.0from
v3.0-fix_proclist_use_after_free
Nov 5, 2025
Merged

Fix heap-after-use between PROXYSQL INTERNAL SESSION and SHOW PROCESSLIST#5191
renecannao merged 3 commits intov3.0from
v3.0-fix_proclist_use_after_free

Conversation

@JavierJF
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR fixes potential invalid memory accesses from SHOW PROCESSLIST. Missing query cleanup in 'PROXYSQL INTERNAL SESSION' could lead to invalid memory accesses during 'SHOW PROCESSLIST' sessions scan.

…ESSLIST'

Missing query cleanup in 'PROXYSQL INTERNAL SESSION' could lead to
invalid memory accesses during 'SHOW PROCESSLIST' sessions scan.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @JavierJF, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a significant memory safety issue where SHOW PROCESSLIST could attempt to access memory that has already been freed by PROXYSQL INTERNAL SESSION operations. The core of the fix involves reordering memory deallocation to occur only after the session's request has been fully processed and logged. To ensure the stability and correctness of this fix, a new regression test has been added that specifically targets and reproduces the previously identified heap-after-use scenario.

Highlights

  • Heap-After-Use Fix: Addresses a critical heap-after-use vulnerability that could lead to invalid memory accesses when SHOW PROCESSLIST is executed concurrently with PROXYSQL INTERNAL SESSION commands.
  • Internal Session Cleanup: Ensures proper termination and cleanup of internal MySQL and PostgreSQL sessions by calling RequestEnd() before deallocating the associated packet memory, thus preventing memory corruption.
  • New Regression Test: Introduces a dedicated regression test case (reg_test_proclist_use_after_free-t.cpp) to simulate the race condition and validate the fix, safeguarding against future reintroductions of this bug.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a heap-use-after-free vulnerability by ensuring RequestEnd is called before the packet memory is freed. The logic is sound and the included comments clarify the change. The addition of a regression test is excellent for preventing this issue from recurring. I've found a minor area for improvement in the new test file to reduce code duplication.

@renecannao
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@JavierJF JavierJF force-pushed the v3.0-fix_proclist_use_after_free branch from 92a7fed to 6ff8501 Compare October 31, 2025 09:07
@JavierJF JavierJF requested a review from wazir-ahmed October 31, 2025 09:07
@renecannao
Copy link
Contributor

Add to whitelist

@mirostauder
Copy link
Contributor

retest this please

Signed-off-by: Miro Stauder <miro@proxysql.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 4, 2025

@renecannao renecannao merged commit 4fa3bf6 into v3.0 Nov 5, 2025
144 of 154 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants